Hardware Unboxed
AMD makes some of thebest processor , but this one is most potential not one of them . According to avideo reviewof the recently released Ryzen 7 5700 , the mainframe is not only a letdown — it ’s downright misleading . compare to old non - ten Ryzen processor , the 5700 appear to be significantly cutdown , which affects its performance in a bad way .
Historically , AMD ’s non - X Ryzen CPUs were pretty much the same as their cristal counterparts , but with slightly downcast clock speeds . Take the Ryzen 5 5600 and the Ryzen 5 5600X , for example . Both chips have six CORE and 12 duds , as well as 32 Bachelor of Medicine of memory cache , but the Ryzen 5 5600 has a clock speed of 4.4GHz , while the 5600X hit 4.6GHz . As a result , many choose the non - X part due to it being slightly tinny while not being a major downgrade .
Hardware Unboxed
Although the above applies to almost all Ryzen chips , the Ryzen 7 5700 quiet changes that . The name implies it has the same eyeglasses as the Ryzen 7 5700X , minus a lower clock speed , but no — the alteration are much bigger .
The video review comes from the YouTube channelHardware Unboxedand points out that the raw AMD CPU , the Ryzen 7 5700 , is more like the Ryzen 7 5700 G than the 5700X. It rollick the same eight cores and 16 threads , and even the same 4.6GHz frequency as both those chips , but it shares the same cache as the 5700 G , not the 5700X. This means that the Ryzen 7 5700 only features 16 MB of L3 cache , as opposed to the 32 MB you ’re getting with the Ryzen 7 5700X.
AMD itself has taught us that this is a significant difference . The ability of the L3 memory cache is especially visible in back scenarios , which is why mainframe like the Ryzen 7 7800X3D are so good for such purpose . As expected , cutting the hoard in one-half on the Ryzen 7 5700 urinate it a unsatisfying processor thatthe commentator referred to as “ anti - consumer at best . ”
The YouTuber tested the Ryzen 7 5700 and compared it to various chips at a similar price point , such as the Ryzen 7 5700X , the Ryzen 7 5700 G , and the Ryzen 5 5600 . The 5700 turned out to be an exact replica of the 5700 G , minus the integrate nontextual matter . The smaller stash stifled its performance by a lot , making it 16 % slower than the Ryzen 7 5700X. In some games , the departure was terrible , turn over as high as 40 % .
In possibility , a 16 % difference is not the remainder of the world . The Ryzen 7 5700 currently costs $ 175 , while the 5700X be $ 205 , so you ’d be saving $ 30 while get a somewhat worsened chip . But this does n’t state us the whole floor , as the Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the fresh 5700 , all the while cost only $ 135 . For sodding gambling use , there ’s a unclouded success — and it ’s definitely not the Ryzen 7 5700 .
The critique from Hardware Unboxed casts a shadow onAMD ’s appointment scheme , and this is n’t even the first time we ’re getting a product with a name that does n’t reflect its actual performance . The Ryzen 7000 umbrella include Zen 2 , Zen 3 , Zen 3 + , and Zen 4 chop , and theRyzen 8000 seriessounds like a new card , but it ’s really not .
The Ryzen 7 5700 marks another instance of a chip that should be diagnose accord to its specs . If someone buys this central processing unit thinking it ’s a slightly underclocked interlingual rendition of the Ryzen 7 5700X , they are probable to be painfully disappoint .
