Asus is n’t a stranger to introducing new technologies or making them available to more citizenry . Consider OLED displays , where Asus has been a loss leader in labor its brilliant colors and ink-black black tolaptops under $ 1,000 . So , now that AMD has introduced its late and perhaps most significant laptop computer chipset , theRyzen AI 9 HX 370 , it ’s unsurprising that the Asus ProArt PX13 is one of the first political machine to equip it .
The Ryzen AI 300 lineup introduces not just a faster C.P.U. and mix GPU with great efficiency , but also one of the truehearted neural processing units ( NPUs ) on a laptop today . It ’s no co-occurrence that “ AI ” is in the chipset ’s stigmatization . The ProArt PX13 leverages it for fast performance and fairly long battery life , in a highly portable13 - column inch laptoppackage .
Specs and configurations
Asus offers just two configurations of the ProArt PX13 . My review whole is $ 1,700 with the Ryzen AI 9 chipset , 32 GB of RAM , a 1 TB SSD , an RTX 4050 GPU , and a 13.3 - inch 3 K OLED exhibit . For $ 2,000 , you get the same configuration with an RTX 4060 GPU . There is no RTX 4070 conformation , which is offered in the ROG Flow X13 .
Hopefully there is some more customization available in the future . A cheaper , 16 GB example model would be nice , for example , as would a 120Hz refresh rate option .
That ’s expensive , but no more than theDell XPS 13and theMacBook Air M3that are both around $ 1,900 . Each of these machines is in the upper tier of premium 13 - inch laptop computer , and the ProArt post exchange 13 is a new member .
Design
The ProArt PX13 is a laptop in its own class . There are mountain of 13 - column inch laptops out there , but they tend to be very thin and almost never support discrete art . In many ways , the ProArt PX13 is a non - gaming edition of theROG Flow X13,a convertible 2 - in-1 , with a show that swivel 360 - degree into four modes : clamshell , tent , media , and tablet . It was unusual enough for a flyspeck gambling laptop to have this kind of hinge , along with its glossy screen , so it name a bit more sense on a neat mainstream gimmick .
Asus does n’t verbalize about an active pen , and there ’s not one in the box , so this is n’t mean to be a used as a digital sketching tool . But the various 2 - in-1 modes are cracking for share content and take in media — specially since HDR content looks wondrous thanks to the OLED display .
consider the ProArt PX13 against other 13 - in laptop computer , it ’s a fairly mainstream machine . It ’s not particularly fragile at up to 0.70 inches — the MacBook Air M3 is just 0.44 inches thick and the XPS 13 is 0.60 in — nor is it particularly light at 3.04 pounds compared to the XPS 13 at 2.6 pounds and the MacBook Air M3 at 2.7 pounds . It ’s even thicker than the16 - inch MacBook Pro . As we ’ll see , it ’s light to rig aside a chassis that ’s a little thicker and heavier give a ton of power packed away inside . For creators on the go , in special , the ProArt PX13 is plenty modest .
It ’s also very well build , with an all - Al chassis that ’s just a little less rigid in the lid than the XPS 13 and equal to the MacBook Air M3 . Like those machines , the ProArt PX13 has a bottom anatomy and keyboard deck that are both quite robust . The flexible joint is bland in opening with one hand , and it continue in place during consumption .
I like the ProArt PX13 ’s design . It does n’t have the silken chasteness of either the Dell or the Apple , with more aggressive venting and a scrap of a bolder aesthetic and with an all - black color way . Asus aimed for call forth power rather than elegance , and it ’s fitting .
Keyboard, touchpad, and Asus DialPad
The keyboard has large keycaps and a spacious layout . The inscription is blocky and quite seeable in any firing , and for darker environments the backlighting is quite bright ( maybe too shiny at its high setting ) . The switch are bass and springy , with a comfortable bottoming action . It might be just a little less snappy than I wish and feel somewhat less precise than the MacBook Air M3 ’s Magic Keyboard , but I like the Asus key fruit palpate better than the XPS 13 ’s . And the Dell ’s zero - wicket layout is hard to get used to .
The touchpad is a mechanical version , and it ’s hunky-dory . I would opt all laptop computer at these prices to utilise haptic mechanisms , but at least this one is prissy and turgid — very much like theZenbook S 16orROG Zephyrus G16 .
Still , the MacBook Air M3 ’s Force Touch haptic touchpad is a fate better , as is the XPS 13 ’s ( except for its hidden nature ) .
luckily , the showing is touch - enabled , which makes sense for a 2 - in-1 .
Interestingly , Asus included its virtual Asus DialPad feature on the touchpad . It ’s a circular indentation with a clit in the middle that ’s back by the ProArt Creator Hub software that provides a server of creative functionality . The Dial cater extra functionality in a diversity in creative apps , as well as access various system configurations .
The Creator Hub allows for enhanced color direction , operation optimizations , and more . It ’s a bit much to dig into , but creators will wish its flexibility and customizability .
Connectivity and webcam
The ProArt PX13 has a mountain more connectivity than most 13 - column inch machines . There are two USB4 USB - C connectedness , which have most of the functionality of Thunderbolt 4 , along with a legacy USB - A port wine , an HDMI 2.1 association , and a microSD board proofreader .
The XPS 13 and MacBook Air M3 both have just two USB - carbon port with Thunderbolt 4 ( although the Apple also has a MagSafe 3 connection for power ) , and neither have SD notice financial backing . The XPS 13 does n’t have a 3.5 millimetre audio Jack-tar . Wireless connectivity is in full up to date with Wi - Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 .
The webcam has a 1080p resolve , with an infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello facial credit . That resolution is the new measure , and the ProArt PX13 can plow basic web conferencing well enough .
Performance
The biggest story here is the fresh AMD Ryzen AI 300 transmission line of chipsets , which anticipate a significant uptick in performance . There are three versions , the Ryzen AI 9 365 with 10 central processor nitty-gritty and 20 duds and 12 GPU cores in the Radeon 880 M integrated graphics . The Ryzen AI 9 370 and 375 both have 12 CPU cores and 24 threads and 16 GPU cores . All practice 28 watts of power by default and can be configure to carry at between 15 and 54 W . The unexampled chipsets use a intermixture of Zen 5 and Zen 5c core , with the latter being more compact but just as fast as the others .
The primary competition includes Intel Meteor Lake , the Qualcomm Snapdragon X , and the Apple Silicon M3 . Meteor Lake has several version , but the most rough-cut is the Core Ultra 7 155H with 16 nucleus ( six Performance , eight Efficient , and two Low Power Efficient ) and 22 thread , running at 28 watts with a lower limit of 20 watts and up to 115 watts of Turbo power .
The Snapdragon X Elite has 12 cores ( eight performance and four efficient ) running at up to 3.8GHz . Both have moderately fast structured graphics . Finally , the M3 chipset ranges in power from the base model with eight CPU cores and either eight or 10 GPU core up to the M3 Max with 16 central processing unit effect and 40 GPU cores .
The ProArt PX13 uses the Ryzen AI 9 370 HX 370 chipset . My review building block used the RTX 4050 , an entry - level GPU , with the debauched RTX 4060 as an alternative . As we ’ll see in our cortege of benchmark , it ’s a very fast chipset for a 13 - column inch laptop , and when combined with the distinct nontextual matter makes for a much faster machine . It does lead a chip hot and loud under load , but not unusually so for ( as we ’ll see ) a fast laptop .
When compared with the Dell XPS 13 9345 with the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80 - 100 and running Windows on Arm , the ProArt PX13 is roughly as degraded in CPU - intensive benchmarks like Cinebench 2024 and Geekbench 6 . I ca n’t liken much more , because not many other benchmark move natively the Dell . Looking at GPU execution , the ProArt PX13 is a lot quicker . It would be even more faster with the RTX 4060 . The Asus is also fast than the MacBook Air M3 in these benchmark .
Overall , the ProArt PX13 is fabulously degraded for productiveness user , and will churn through the most demanding workflows . It will also serve as a good entry - level 1080p gaming laptop . Note that the Asus Zenbook S 16 uses the same AMD chipset but with the integrated Radeon 890 M graphics . That GPU mark 3,207 in the 3DMark Time Spy bench mark compared to the ProArt PX13 ’s much faster 8,503 .
But then we take to also demand to consider how the ProArt PX13 execute for a Lord , which as the name implies is the laptop ’s primary target . And here , Asus did a with child job of create a muscular machine .
face at two originative benchmarks — Pugetbench Premiere Pro that lean in a live rendering of Adobe Premiere Pro and Pugetbench Photoshop , which also runs in the live Adobe app — the ProArt PX 13 does well .
In Premiere Pro , which can use a Windows laptop computer ’s GPU to bucket along up sure creative process , the ProArt PX13 is flying than several laptop computer with much faster GPUs . That include the Acer Swift X 14 with the RTX 4070 and the Asus ROG Flow Z13 with the RTX 4060 . It ’s a destiny faster than the Dell XPS 14 with the same RTX 4050 , and the Zenbook S 16 with AMD ’s Radeon 490 M structured graphics ca n’t keep up .
Apple ’s M3 chipset has various mainframe optimizations that hotfoot up video encryption and decode , and the MacBook Air M3 is reasonably fast here . I include the MacBook Pro 16 with the M3 Max chipset as a proxy for the MacBook Pro 14 , which is about as fast . The M3 Max is a lot quicker for video editing .
In Photoshop , the ProArt PX13 was again very fast , leading all but the MacBook Pro 16 . This is down to the Ryzen AI 9 ’s performance and is less influenced by the GPU .
Overall , Asus has made a very fast and extremely portable laptop computer for creators . As we ’ll see , its public presentation is matched up well with its splendid OLED exhibit .
AI performance
I ’d love to say how the AMD AI 9 chipset ’s very fast NPU performs proportional to the competition . It ’s rated at 50 tera operations per second ( TOPS ) , compared to the Qualcomm Snapdragon X chipsets at 45 TOPS and the Intel Meteor Lake at 10 top . The Apple M3 ’s Neural Engine ( NE ) has 18 tops . MacBook users will need to wait for the M4 ’s 38 TOPS to unite those ranks .
The trouble is that we do n’t have dear AI benchmarks that run across platform and directly test NPU and NE operation . Microsoft has set its Copilot+ PC NPU necessity at 40 TOPS or more , and Apple is supporting its upcomingApple Intelligencefeatures across all MacBooks belong back to the M1 chipset — so , Apple is matter on CPU , GPU , and RAM to make up for earliest NE lack .
Right now , it does n’t matter much . There ’s not a lot in Windows that will utilize flying NPUs . Microsoft is only suffer Qualcomm with its Copilot+ AI features , and even that ’s limited . There are some apps that can use an NPU , and perhaps they ’ll be hie up . And by running those apps on the NPU , they wo n’t be as tight as if they run on distinct GPUs — which are a lot quicker than NPUs — but they ’ll be a portion more efficient . We just ca n’t try any of it without fussy - platform benchmarks .
Asus includes several apps that tout AI funding , including StoryCube for managing photograph and picture and MuseTree for creating and bring off originative work flow . Those likely benefit from the blend NPU and GPU AI operation , giving you at least a few sluttish ways to play with the novel capabilities .
Battery life
The next challenge for the ProArt PX13 and its AMD chipset is battery life . After all , while Intel has n’t caught up in efficiency , both Qualcomm and Apple run branch chipsets that tend to result the room . It ’s one matter to compact in a plenty of carrying into action today . A laptop also needs to have nifty electric battery life story to compete .
Asus take in 73 watt - hours of shelling , capacity which is a lot for a 13 - inch laptop computer . The XPS 13 , for deterrent example , has just 55 watt - hours , while the Zenbook S 16 has even more at 78 W - hr . Notably , the MacBook Air M3 has just 52.6 W - hours .
Looking at these result , the ProArt PX13 ca n’t fare close to equalise the most efficient laptop computer today . The two Intel Meteor Lake laptops here are deceiving — most consort the same Core Ultra 7 155H chipset are nigh to the ProArt PX13 . While the Qualcomm laptop computer have very strong video loop battery life ( the least - demand test ) , the MacBook Air M3 lasts the longest when doing real work .
The ProArt PX13 has decent shelling life for such a portable laptop computer that can handle reasonably demanding creative work . But you ’ll need to carry your power adapter along with you .
Display and audio
The 13.3 - inch 16:10 3 K ( 2880 by 1800 ) OLED display is undischarged . It looks great out of the boxwood , with promising , dynamic colors and inky blacks . That ’s nothing new for OLED exhibit , and Asus does it as well as anyone .
My colorimeter validates the panel ’s suitability for creators . Its color gamut is wide of the mark at 100 % of sRGB , 97 % of AdobeRGB , and 99 % of DCI - P3 . They ’re also accurate at a Delta - atomic number 99 of 0.64 ( less than 1.0 is considered excellent ) . Brightness was very good at 380 nits , although not the vivid I ’ve see for OLED , and contrast is 26,510:1 with the common pure Black .
The display dispatch the package for creative work . Media consumer will also love the exhibit . Audio was just o.k. , though , with duple speakers that are good enough for organisation phone and YouTube videos . But music , TV shows , and movies pray for a good pair of earpiece .
A special mobile laptop for demanding creators
If you ’re await for a laptop computer for picture editing or eminent - end picture taking oeuvre , you ’ll want fast functioning and a showing with excellent colouring . The ProArt PX13 provides both . It ’s not the degenerate laptop we ’ve reviewed for this work — not even nigh , really .
But few are so portable . No , battery lifetime is n’t great , but that ’s not to be expect . The ProArt PX13 will rent you get your piece of work done without lugging around a Brobdingnagian laptop computer . And that ’s well deserving the expensive price .
