When you ’re get a larger laptop computer today that ’s drive atvideo editorsandphotographers , you involve to do something special . you’re able to build up around a outstanding show , an innovative figure , really fast components , or particular input machine . Or , you may choose all right components and offer up a really attractive price .
That ’s what Asus did with the Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q533 . It ’s not the most stunningly configure laptop computer and it has some old - schooling components . But it ’s tight , reasonably well - build , and more affordable than most large laptop for Jehovah at $ 1,050 . For less demanding exploiter , it ’s a substantial choice .
Specs and configurations
Asus has one version of the Vivobook Pro 15 OLED uncommitted , with an Intel Core Ultra 7 155H CPU , 16 GB of DDR5 RAM , a 1 TB SSD , an Nvidia RTX 3050 GPU , and a 15.6 - in 16:9 FHD OLED display . Right now , it ’s on sale for $ 1,050 , down from $ 1,300 . As long as it stays there , it ’s an interesting large - covert laptop computer for Divine on a very tight budget .
There are n’t many 15 - inch or larger laptops with a discrete GPU ( even an older one ) for so small money . The XPS 16 go at $ 1,999 with the same GPU and RAM , a small SSD , and a newer RTX 4050 , while the HP Envy 16 is $ 1,850 with an Intel Core i7 - 13700 , an RTX 4060 , and an IPS video display . Even the smallerXPS 14is considerably more expensive at $ 2,099 with an RTX 4050 . Then again , there are n’t many laptop these Clarence Day selling the late - gen RTX 3050 either .
Battery life
There ’s a 75 James Watt - hour battery pack inside , and the relatively humiliated resolution of the otherwise king - athirst OLED presentation helped the Vivobook Pro 15 OLED twist in some mixed battery life results .
In our internet pasture test that guide through a series of complex web pages , the Vivobook managed 10.25 hours , which is above intermediate and very well for the Core Ultra 7 155H chipset . It made it to 10.75 hours in our video looping psychometric test , which is a slight less than mean . The XPS 14 hit 8.25 and 10.25 hours with its OLED display and 11.75 and 15 hours with its IPS panel , while the XPS 16 ’s 4K+ OLED display come in at 5.5 hours for both exam . Asus seems to have threaded a phonograph needle with the Vivobook Pro 15 OLED , which might last close to a full day with mixed use but not much more .
Design
The Vivobook Pro 15 OLED is an quondam - school laptop computer in a few of import ways . For now , I ’ll deal with its intention , where the laptop builds around a 15.6 - in display that ’s in the old 16:9 vista ratio . The vast majority of laptops today are in the taller 16:10 aspect ratio that ’s honest for productivity . While the Vivobook has thin display bezels on the English , the top and bottom bezels are large by modern standards . That gives it a less than modern appearing and makes for a laptop computer that ’s no little than a machine with a bigger display and smaller bezel like theDell XPS 16with its 16.3 - column inch showing . As we ’ll see , though , the Vivobook is more of a contender to the smallerXPS 14 .
If the display was a monetary value - cutting measure ( I ca n’t reckon of another intellect ) , then the plastic human body is another . Even so , the Vivobook Pro 15 organic light-emitting diode ’s construction is very good . It has an aluminum lid and there ’s zero bending , turn , or twisting anywhere . That ’s distinctive for Asus laptops . The Vivobook is a small thickheaded than the XPS 16 at 0.78 column inch versus 0.74 inch , but it ’s well lighter at 4.17 Lebanese pound versus 4.7 pound . The XPS 14 is thin and light at 0.71 in and 3.7 pounds , and the HP Envy 16 is the same thickness but almost a quid fleshy .
Aesthetically , the Vivobook Pro 15 organic light-emitting diode is a little boring , but that ’s OK . It has an all - disgraceful chassis that ’s entirely minimalist except along the sides , where the ports and vents are most prominent . The keyboard has bold white lettering and offers just a picayune extra splash . The other laptop I ’ve advert so far are better look , but that ’s clear not what Asus was center on here .
Keyboard, touchpad, and connectivity
The Vivobook ’s keyboard is very good , with big keycaps and plenty of spacing even with the anachronistic numerical computer keyboard . That ’s another nod to previous - schooltime computation when laptops like the XPS 16 and Envy 16 give them up . Both of those laptop computer have Speaker to each side of their keyboard while Asus place them to the sides of the bod , so that ’s one difference .
The touchpad is a mechanical version that ’s large enough . It works fine , but more and more Windows laptop computer are move to tactile interlingual rendition . I ’m look forward to when the engineering makes its way to less expensive machines . What ’s more interesting about the touchpad , though , is the embedded Asus DialPad . It ’s a slight pitting on the touchpad surface surrounding a button that appropriate for navigating through functionality in a variety of apps . There ’s a more sophisticated Dial in theAsus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED , but this version is more in keep with the lower cost . It ’s a small convenience overall and not a reason to grease one’s palms the laptop .
Connectivity is very safe , with a slew of both advanced and legacy ports . There are far more porthole than on the XPS 16 , in fact , and where Dell ’s much more expensive laptop use a microSD placard lector , Asus included a full - sizing version that ’s a lot more convenient . Wireless connectivity is the latest widely - used standard .
The 5MP webcam is a slight stone’s throw above the increasingly standard 1080p version , and it provide a quality range of a function with AISense photographic camera and randomness cancellation applied science . The laptop ’s Meteor Lake chipset includes a Neural Processing Unit ( NPU ) that ’s supported by Microsoft ’s Studio Effects public utility for videoconferencing .
Performance
Another direction that the Vivobook Pro 15 OLED is stuck in the yesteryear is in its use of an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 , which is a propagation old . Asus used a current - gen Intel Core Ultra 7 155H , so the RTX 3050 was an odd choice ( more cost - cutting ? ) . The Core Ultra 7 155H is a 28 - watt Meteor Lake chipset with 16 cores ( six Performance , eight Efficient , and two Low Power Efficient ) and 22 thread , and it boast the NPU mentioned above . properly now , the NPU does n’t pretend public presentation , but we ’ll see how that changes over the next year or two .
One thing I ’ll observe is that although the chassis did n’t get red-hot , the fans were very loud in functioning style . They were loud than the fans on the XPS 16 and XPS 14 by a significant allowance . So , if you need to forge in a quiet surround , that ’s something to keep in psyche .
Nevertheless , the Vivobook did a lot with its components . It ’s one of the faster laptops we ’ve review with the Core Ultra 7 155H. Its RTX 3050 was , unsurprisingly , slower than the RTX 4050 in the XPS 14 in synthetic benchmarks , but it was still reasonably quicker than structured graphics . In our CPU - intensive benchmarks , the Vivobook was at least as tight as more expensive machine . In a couple of tests , it was a bit quicker . It fell behind the XPS 14 in the GPU portion of Cinebench R24 , but interestingly , it was quicker in the 3DMark Time Spy trial run .
Given that last result , I ’m not surprised at the Vivobook ’s public presentation in the Pugetbench Premiere Pro bench mark that runs in a live version of Adobe ’s Premiere Pro . On Windows laptops , the bench mark can utilize a distinct GPU for speeding up various tasks , and that has a important encroachment on scores . The Vivobook Pro 15 OLED was 11 % faster than the XPS 14 , and that showed up in the individual elements of the bench mark .
That make the Vivobook a serious choice for less - need Godhead who want an low-priced laptop that put up usable performance . It wo n’t knock anyone ’s sock off but it ’ll be faster than laptops without a distinct GPU , and its older GPU does n’t hold it back . It will also meet very demanding productivity motive . What it wo n’t do is serve as a play laptop computer for more than esports title and older biz running at 1080p and with shrink graphics .
Display and audio
As mentioned before , the Vivobook ’s OLED display is in the former - schoolhouse 16:9 aspect proportion that ’s not as comfortable for productivity piece of work . And , at just Full HD ( 1920 x 1080 ) and 15.6 inch , it ’s not abrupt enough . But it ’s an OLED display , make it a sort of an odd duck’s egg among competing laptops .
It ’s a very good showing even give its restriction . Its gloss are wide ( 100 % sRGB , 98 % AdobeRGB , 100 % DCI - P3 ) and accurate with a DeltaE of 1.19 ( less than 1.0 is considered excellent ) . It ’s also bright at 398 nit and it has OLED ’s usual perfect blacks and near - infinite dividing line . So , it ’s a great display for productiveness users and creators likewise , as long as they do n’t take care a scummy - resolution presentation . Many user might not , give the convinced impact on battery life .
Two side - firing speakers provide plenty of book and unmortgaged mids and highschool . There was a tactile sensation of distortion when turned all the style up , and I had to turn things down to about 50 % to domesticize it . Bass was n’t very present , so you ’ll want to keep a pair of headphones handy , specially when the fan are their loudest . The XPS 14 and XPS 16 both have good sound systems .
A solid value choice among creator laptops
The Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q533 is n’t the most exciting 15 - inch or great laptop I ’ve reviewed . It ’s not the most advanced , it ’s not the flying , and it does n’t have a single standout feature that made drop a line this review a pot of fun .
What it does have , though , is a very attractive price and enough performance and display quality for anyone who wants to do some lightweight creative workplace on the go . You could pass a portion more and get a much better laptop computer . But , you do n’t have to when you may spend a mess less for more than good enough .
