With the rise of AI assistants , developers and creatives alike are clump to words propagation tools . Two of the most democratic platform today master the distance : OpenAI ’s ChatGPTandMicrosoft Copilot . Both run onGPT-4 , but which is unspoilt for you ?
We review their pricing mannikin , performance benchmark , and singular strengths to aid you decide which AI associate best fits your needs .
Pricing and tiers
Both ChatGPT and Copilot are freely usable to all users , though at that tier , they are rather circumscribed in their capability . For exercise , ChatGPT user wo n’t have accession to theDall - E image generatoror be able to create their own GPT mini - app . Copilot on the other handwriting is determine in the full chats per day users can have ( 300 ) , the routine of turns per chat ( 30 ) , and number of written document uploads per day , as well as the upload file sizing .
For small businesses , both fellowship offer Team subscriptions . OpenAI burden $ 25-$30 / month per exploiter for ChatGPT - Plus Teams , count on whether you pay monthly or per annum , while Team Copilot will congeal you back a 2-dimensional $ 30 / calendar month per substance abuser . For declamatory stage business , OpenAI and Microsoft each offer up Enterprise accounts , though you ’ll have to contact them directly for a price quote .
Advantages of using Copilot
At the Pro level , Copilot holds the strong advantage of being able tointegrate into theMicrosoft 365software cortege . This enable it to exercise straightaway with Word , Excel , PowerPoint , Outlook , and OneNote to streamline work flow and provide material - time analysis of documents and correspondence . This is very similar to what Google’sGemini Advancedplan does with Workspace and something that ChatGPT Plus currently does not .
Advantages of using ChatGPT
What ChatGPT miss in ability to integrate into a specific production ecosystem , it produce up for in universal versatility . Copilot Pro is design with professional and Enterprise undertaking in mind , so you ’ll recover that ChatGPT works advantageously as a oecumenical help capable to speak on a unsubtle reach of topics , especially those that do n’t involve taunt . ChatGPT also address a far greater number of nomenclature than Copilot — 80 versus 28 , respectively .
While you ’ll have to pay extra for double generation , OpenAI ’s service put up access to a innkeeper of purpose - built GPT app through its GPT Marketplace for drug user to try out . GPT ’s are the ChatGPT equivalent of apps , small programs that do specific tasks , likePlanty , which doles out horticulture advice , orScholar GPT , which give way user access to hundreds of millions of research paper from Google Scholar , ArchivX , and others .
Microsoftbriefly offered its Copilot Pro usersthe power to build their own GPTs , as ChatGPT Plus user are capable ; however , Microsoft pluck the characteristic on July 10 , 2024 , just four month after its debut .
Speed and accuracy comparison
In terms of fastness , both divine service are equally matched , for the most part due to the fact that they ’re running the same underlying GPT-4 model . For example , when posed with the prompt “ A box stop 25 blue marbles , 6 icteric marble , and 11 flushed marble , what is the chance of indiscriminately take a red marble ? ” both correctly account 11/42 , though co-pilot went a footmark further and converted that into an easy - to - understand per centum .
That ’s because Copilot has been fine - tune and tweaked by Microsoft to better meet its own function .
Their responses differ even further when asked about doctrine and whether reality is an illusion . co-pilot returned a disjointed lean of examples of brain behaviors that assist “ fill in ” our personal discernment of reality , including ocular magic , blind spots , memory gaps and imaging versus world . ChatGPT , on the other hand , begin explaining the perspective that various school of thought had on the subject area , from the ghostlike and philosophical to the scientific and psychological .
When necessitate to generate a python snippet to count the figure of words in a pay document , they again take different approaches to the problem . ChatGPT designed a book that include computer error manipulation while Copilot first cleaned the text of punctuation mark and numbers , though both solutions were ultimately ramp up around the same “ len(words ) ” program line , Python ’s build - in string duration measurement dick .
Which is better?
Neither ? Both ? It count on what you want the AI to help you with . If you want an AI to pelt with the weird query that come out into your head while showering ( no ? just me ? ) , cater advice on specific discipline , summarize uploaded documents , and analyze image , test ChatGPT first .
If you ’re conversely looking for an AI to help improve your steganography or slide seamlessly into your existing Microsoft 365 suite , give Copilot a shot . Then interchange and taste the other . They ’re both loose — what do you have to lose ?
Leaning toward ChatGPT ? It might be fourth dimension to consider which is best betweenChatGPT and Google Gemini .
