A dystopian play that thrills and disturbs , Civil Waris a picture of raw , immense might . Written and directed byEx Machinafilmmaker Alex Garland , it takes place in a near - future America that has been tear apart by two contradict military factions . It ’s a shotgun blast of speculative fable that , in other words , feels understandably barrack by — and rooted in — the very real political and moral divisions that are wreaking havoc throughout the U.S. today . For that cause , it ’s unnervingly easy to meetCivil Waron its own terms and make the same jump into its fancied reality that all keen dystopian dramatic play need .

Garland sagely and purposefully choose not to crowd his celluloid with the kind of outside detail that might make the personal belief of its character reference absolved . The portrait he paints of America ’s self - inflicted downfall is politically shadowy , which may number as a shock to some and make the film unmanageable to engage with for others . By make it impossible for viewers to get it on who they should root for or against , though , the movie maker has made it so that the only thing you could concentre on are the many moments of horror and destruction that unfold throughoutCivil War . The result is a lean , 109 - minute action epic that is devastating and terrifying in adequate measuring rod , and which captures the seeming hopelessness of modern - day America in all of its suffocating might .

Civil Warbegins not with a text edition dump explain the backstory of its dystopian future , but a close - up of an American president ( Nick Offerman ) as he stumblingly prepares to give a speech about the ongoing dispute between the U.S. military and the Western Forces . The latter , we ’re inform , is a military coalition formed by California and Texas as a part of those states ’ share charge to secede from the rest of America . Offerman ’s president assign on a elusive side and forebode that the WF is nearing defeat . We rapidly learn that the opponent is honest in what turns out to be just one of many instances in whichCivil Warpokes pickle in America ’s blustery brand of exceptionalism .

From there , the film foot up with Lee Smith ( Kirsten Dunst ) , a veteran warfare lensman who has make up one’s mind to travel with her Reuters fellow , Joel ( Wagner Moura ) , to Washington , D.C. to interview Offerman ’s commander - in - chief before he is belike captured and execute by the WF . Before they set out , they jibe to take Sammy ( Stephen McKinley Henderson ) , an old journalist who works for , as Joel put it , “ what ’s left of the New York Times , ” and Jessie ( Cailee Spaeny ) , a young photojournalist who revere Lee , with them . Along the way , the four goal up in several tense situation that shed more lighting on America ’s fractured , fundamental state , bring further fuel to Jessie ’s passion for her job , and make Lee doubtfulness even more her office in the wartime conflicts she ’s photographed throughout her career .

These sequences , which effectively break upCivil War‘s central road trip into different chapter , are frightening and transfix in all different ways . The New York City dissent where Jessie and Lee first meet is , for example , film in a handheld , cinéma vérité flair that redact you in the very middle of a crowd of shouting , furious citizens and climaxes with a suicide bombing that is staged so intimately that you much finger the concussive forcefulness of it in your seat . A second - act standoff between the film ’s core diarist and a xenophobic soldier ( flirt with chilling unconcern by Jesse Plemons ) is , conversely , shot with an unsettling hush and escalates at such a patient , hushed pace that every gunfire that stress it is as impactful as any explosion . Never before in his calling has Garland had a well suitcase on action filmmaking than he does here .

All ofCivil War‘s go under piece , whether it be a clinically put to death walkalong that arrive near the destruction of its first act or its climactic , D.C.-set encroachment , are interrupt by the clicks of Jessie and Lee ’s photographic camera and mute cuts to the epitome taken . These cutaway not only add a sense of ocular change to even the film ’s most cacophonous gunfight , but they also establish a enchanting duality withinCivil War‘s action sequences . At every moment , Jessie and Lee are putting their body and lives on the line to capture effigy that , no matter how acute they may be , still evoke a sense of observational detachment . Furthermore , as they both strive to produce the most esthetic and evocative frames they can , questions inevitably rise about the very purpose of figure of speech - making , as well as how well the thrill of successfully capture even the most horrific of events can make one forget why they seek to do so in the first station .

The moving-picture show ’s head - on , clear - eyed feeler to its subject affair givesCivil Wara blunt - edge military unit that is both staggering and reinforce its unexpressed ideas about how people choose to respond to violence . Some , like Jessie and Joel , charge headfirst into it with an ebullience that borders on rashness . As the latter , Moura turns in a magnetic , witching performance that capably contain the swarthiness Garland ’s playscript sometimes demands . Meanwhile , coming off her genius - making oeuvre in last year’sPriscilla , Spaeny brings a naive , young energy to Jessie that clear her the perfect tabulator to the disillusioned Lee . polite Warbalances the perspectives of each of its lead well , but the film ultimately belong to Dunst , whose performance attractively communicates the regret that exists beneath her character ’s cut - and - dried , backbreaking - line image without relying on any weepy , maudlin shows of emotion .

Dunst ’s human face , with its impassiveness and steely regard , proves to be the pure ocular anchor forCivil War , a film that stage the drop of America ’s empire so squarely that it does n’t give you any chance to shrug or look away . Like so many of Garland ’s films , it finds the correct railway line between sci - fi surrealism and realism . Its near - succeeding world is odd and yet easily placeable , a collapse mirror that when arrest up in front of America ’s ever - smiling boldness reveals a reflection that is scraggy , stomach - churning , and , most upsetting of all , true .

The motion-picture show is no sanguinary than many of the musical genre films that are made now , and its content is n’t particularly worse than what we ’re all evidence on the news every solar day . There is , nonetheless , something horrify aboutCivil Warand the off-color way it presents its warfare - torn America . It ’s an consuming , technically stunning action picture show — one made all the more sinewy by the fact that the events of its story feel both bizarre and potentially right around the quoin .

Civil Waris now roleplay in theaters .