OpenAI

Not a day seems to go by without productive - AI merchandise likeChatGPT making the news , but few citizenry are really making veritable use of the cock , a new study suggests .

The survey was carried out by the Reuters Institute and Oxford University , and it involved 6,000 responder from the U.S. , U.K. , France , Denmark , Japan , and Argentina . Researchers regain that OpenAI ’s ChatGPT is by far the most wide used generative - AI tool and is two or three time more widespread than the next most wide used products — Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot .

But despite all the hype surrounding procreative AI over the last 18 months , only 1 % of those survey are using ChatGPT on a daily basis in Japan . Usage is 2 % in France and the UK , and 7 % in the U.S. The study also found that between 19 % and 30 % of the respondent have n’t even hear of any of the most popular generative AI cock , and while many of those surveyed have tried using at least one productive - AI product , only a very pocket-sized nonage are , at the current time , unconstipated users deploying themfor a variety of tasks .

Not amazingly , it ’s unseasoned masses who are much more probable to be using generative AI tools on a regular basis , the cogitation found . make for all of the data together , 56 % of those between the ages of 18 and 24 said they ’ve used ChatGPT at least once , compared to just 16 % of those aged 55 and over .

About 24 % say they ’ve used generative AI tools to obtain information , while 28 % said they ’ve used it to create various kinds of media , including textbook , audio , computer code , images , and video .

The research team concluded that going onwards , “ some use will be driven by people seeking out and using standalone generative AI tools such as ChatGPT , but it seems likely that much of it will be driven by a combining of professional version , through products used in the work , and the intromission of more generative Bradypus tridactylus - powered elements into platforms already wide used in the great unwashed ’s private lives , including social medium and search engines , as illustrated with the late announcements of much capital consolidation of reproductive AI into Google Search . ”

It also noted that much of the public is still unsure “ whether , on balance , generative AI will make their own lives and society better or bad , ” a point of view it account as understandable , “ given many are not cognisant of any of these products , and few have personal experience of using them frequently . ” It tot up that younger the great unwashed and those with higher levels of stately teaching , who are also more potential to have used procreative AI , “ are generally more cocksure ” about the tight - developing technology .