We are constantly produce comparing betweenAMD and Intelwhen review some of thebest gaming laptopson the marketplace . Just like desktops , we ’re endeavor to ascertain which companionship crap thebest processoryou can buy . It ’s never a perfect compare , though . Differences between the thermal design and build quality of laptops make it next to impossible to truly get a one - to - one comparing . Now , we finally have the chance for that comparison .
Asus send out its new ROG Zephyrus G16 equipped with one of AMD ’s newZen 5CPUs , give us a chance to liken it to the Intel - basedROG Zephyrus G16we reviewed earlier this year . I did n’t await a bounteous dispute in public presentation given that these two laptops are basically indistinguishable . Boy , was I wrong .
A rare opportunity
This kind of chance does n’t come up often . We compare AMD and Intel CPUs directly all the time , even in laptops , but you do n’t get the fortune to see two well-nigh identical laptops go capitulum - to - head very often . The figure of a laptop play a major theatrical role in performance , which is why we almost never make blanket claim about how AMD and Intel stack up against each other when comparing two laptop computer in closing off . We have to bring in a bunch of laptop to see if there ’s a trend .
With the Zephyrus G16 , I ’ve had the opportunity to compare AMD and Intel forthwith . Everything about these two laptop computer is superposable . They utilise the same charger , same trunk , same cooling solvent , and the same graphics card . There are two major differences — the CPU and the memory . First , the memory . The AMD Zephyrus G16 has 32 GB of memory while the Intel version only has 16 gigabit . Thememory is soldered , so as much as I would like to take out a DIMM and get a reliable apple - to - orchard apple tree comparison , that ’s not potential .
The more significant conflict is , of course , the CPU . The AMD version is leveraging a Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 , which is a 12 - heart CPU with a maximal hike clock of 5.1GHz . It operates at 28W. The Intel rendering use a Core Ultra 9 185H , which has 16 cores and a boost clock of 5.1GHz . It operates at 45W.
Although it sounds like Intel is onwards on spec , that ’s in reality not the case . The Core Ultra 185H uses a intercrossed architecture , and some of the core do n’t support Hyperthreading . Because of that , the Core Ultra 185H stomach 22 threads while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports 24 . disregardless of the eyeglasses , the significant thing to sleep with is that these are AMD ’s and Intel ’s flagship mobile central processor right now , at least until we seeIntel ’s Lunar Lake CPUslater this year .
When you need to be productive
Let ’s not waste any more sentence . you’re able to see my benchmarks below , which focus on real applications as much as possible . For the creation apps , I used PugetBench for Godhead , so the number you see is the score I got in those benchmark . eminent is better , of course .
There ’s a lot of interesting stuff here . First , Cinebench . Although Cinebench is n’t a “ real ” app , it serve determine the level for the remainder between these two CPUs . AMD is out front in both single- and multi - core execution . Given the difference in memory board capacity , I ran Cinebench to ensure that there really was a conflict in the CPU alone and that performance change were n’t alone a outcome of the retentivity departure .
Photoshop help oneself on that quest , too . you’re able to see it ’s a major outlier liken to the other test I ran , and that ’s no surprise . Photoshop uses a percentage of the memory available to it , allowing the AMD laptop with its 32 GB of memory to achieve a much eminent score . You should n’t attribute the carrying out startle exclusively to the CPU . Instead , regard Cinebench and Photoshop opposite ends of liken these two laptops . In Cinebench , the CPU is making the biggest conflict , while in Photoshop , the CPU is playing much less of a role .
DaVinci Resolve and Premiere Pro provide the clearest look into how these two CPUs differ . AMD was 10 % ahead in Resolve and 7 % out front in Premiere Pro , which is a fairly consistent compass across the tests I ran . It ’s one thing to find two alike laptops with differing CPUs and equate them . With these results , though , it ’s secure to say that the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is about 7 % to 10 % quicker than the Core Ultra 9 185H , at least in productivity apps .
A little gaming action
Games are a very interesting area to wait at with these two laptops , and that ’s for a duad of reasons . First , they ’re using the same GPU , but more importantly , both GPUs are tune up identically . laptop computer brands not only set differentTotal Graphics Power ( TGP)amounts but they also have different software program parameters . Both of these laptops apply the RTX 4070 with a 105W TGP , and they both have their baron managed through Asus Armoury Crate .
I thought that would mean the two laptops would execute very likewise , but that really was n’t the pillowcase . Before getting into the game , it ’s worth setting the stage with 3DMark . As you could see below , the two machine were essentially identical in Fire Strike and Time Spy , with the AMD conformation slenderly trailing . astonishingly , the AMD conformation was much dim in Port Royal , which is aray tracingbenchmark . Ray tracing can stress the central processing unit quite a bit , and perhaps the excess power uncommitted to the Core Ultra 185H is helping out in that test .
3DMark does n’t tell the full story , and my results from tangible games below proves that fact . Across the dining table , the AMD edition of the Zephyrus G16 is faster than the Intel version , and sometimes by a pregnant perimeter . InHorizon Zero Dawn , AMD is allow for a huge upthrow , and inRed Dead Redemption 2,AMD is about tally 60 frames per second ( fps ) while Intel is n’t even tight .
Games rarely benefit from 32 GB of memory versus 16 GB , and the games I test here really do n’t call for more than 16 GB of memory . What ’s surprising is that all of these tests were ran at the aboriginal resolution of the screen ( 1600p ) and at the highest graphics preset . At high settlement and graphics context , the central processing unit normally play less of a role in performance . The results here are a good showcase of the delicate ecosystem that ’s going on inside a laptop .
AMD wins this round
Intel is gearing up to plunge its Lunar Lake CPUs , so it ’s no surprise that AMD derive out on top in this comparison . I just did n’t bear AMD to prevail as much as it did . Despite using a pocket-sized big businessman envelope and being at a core disadvantage , the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is faster than the Core Ultra 9 185H across both game and productivity apps . That ’s before we even get to aspects of a laptop like battery living — read ourZenBook S 16 reviewto see how long AMD ’s new laptop CPUs last .
That does n’t mean you should just blindly beak up an AMD laptop . Even two laptops with indistinguishable specification can have far different performance , so it ’s always important to consult single laptop review before make a buying determination . Between AMD and Intel in the same design , however , I ’d advocate break down with AMD , at least until we see what Lunar Lake has to offer .
