I ’ve been anticipating comparing the LG G3 OLED to the Samsung Q95C for months now .

More recently , though , that ’s becomenervousanticipation . And that ’s actually great news for you : Both of these TVs are stellar . They are gorgeous . Each is so full , it is hard for me to imagine anyone buying either of these TVs and being anything other than absolutely ecstatic . So , that ’s it , right ? Job done ? Go in ataraxis and buy either one ! You ’ll be stoke either way . interchange a coin ! Make it fun !

Except that ’s not how this run . Some of you out there are view purchase one of these telecasting . They are expensive . You want to get the right-hand one . You ’re disquieted about FOMO : the fear of miss out . You might be worried about FOBR : Fear of Buyers ’ Remorse . That may not be a real acronym , but it for sure is a literal experience . And for some of you — if you are being totally honest with yourself —   you kind of just want to know , with absolute sure thing , that you have the right-down better . That ’s because you ’re mad and stock of that one annoying friend who ’s always getting the nerveless toy , and you do n’t want to hear it from them on this one . You need to fret their face in your raw , absolutely - no - motion - the - best boob tube . That is a matter , no sentiency in denying it .

Close up of the stand of a Samsung S95C.

Samsung S95CZeke Jones/Digital Trends

And that , my friends , is why I ’m a little nervous going into this comparison . Because even though I know some thing are subjective , and even though I know I am notpersonallyresponsible for your happiness , I do sense a responsibility to give the best advice that I can . And to break this all down in a fashion that is helpful to you and your private needs , which are vast and varied .

Not to mention the fact that there are multiple multihour videos on YouTube compare these two TVs in excruciating point . So , I feel like I need to go in the other steering and keep this one tight . I ’ll do my good , common people , OK ? That ’s all I can promise .

So , with that off my dresser , let ’s do this . Let ’s compare the LG G3 and the Samsung S95C.

The bezel and top corner of a Samsung S95C.

Samsung S95CZeke Jones/Digital Trends

The big picture

Because I ’ve spread over a lot of this stuff in my individual reviews of theLG G3and   theS95C , I ’m going to move through this clean quick . From a design position , both video are gorgeous , bezel - less wonders . Both will look outstanding on a wall . And to that end , the LG G3 ’s advantage is that its no - gap wall mount is in the boxwood with the TV . It does n’t descend with a sales booth — it comes with a wall mount , and a corking one at that . The S95C ’s advantage is that while itdoesn’tcome with a wall mount , itdoescome with aOne Connect box , which makes scram a clean look on the wall much , much easier since all of your material will connect to this box . And then theonlything running to the TV is one cable , which is easy enough to fish through the wall , and far less of an eyesore if you just rent it swing down . Do n’t do the dangle , though . You deserve better .

As for stand - mounting , the S95C wins with a solid pedestal stand that is a bit much to get together . But does its job well and with class . Thefor the G3 is not my favorite — it shimmy because it is plan to rotate , and is more often than not not up to the same premium standard as the TV .

The remotes are quite different . You will touch this every day , so you ’d well like it , right ? The Samsung remote control is small , minimalist , charges itself with solar cells on the back or via USB - C , and generally mold just o.k. .

A man standing next to an LG G3 showing it’s rear panel and stand.

LG G3Zeke Jones/Digital Trends

The LG Magic Motion remote still does the Wii thing , which I ’m so over at this compass point , and otherwise offers more buttons .

The smart TV interfaces look different , but are functionally very standardized , and candidly , I do n’t care for either of them — not whenGoogle TV , Apple TV , and evenRokuexist . The TVs do offer a peck of sassy plate integrating features , multi - window features , and other fun trick like machine gimmick acknowledgment and elaborate gaming dashboards .

Both offer very low input lag for gaming , along with four HDMI 2.1 embrasure , one with eARC support . Both will supportDolby Atmospassthrough , but the Samsung will not back DTS passthrough . The Samsung also does not supportDolby Vision , but I ’m getting to that .

Neither television sound as skilful as I would like considering how expensive they are . This is supernumerary unsatisfying considering how many transducer are on the back of the Samsung , However , both TVs offer some unparalleled audio integration with thesoundbarsmade by their several brand . So , if you pair off aSamsung soundbarwith the S95C , you may take advantage of Q - Symphony . And anLG soundbarpaired with the G3 will enable LG Sound Sync .

Picture quality

Now , let ’s talk about some picture - quality divergence . I ’m going to depart by paint some broad strokes , but we ’ll dive into some of the detail .

have ’s start with brightness , because with the addition ofMLA – or , micro lens array – the LG G3 has become one of the brightestOLED TVsto   hit the market . MLA is see by me and others as a very rapid counter toQD - OLEDafter that engineering science became the darling of the TV partisan community in 2022 .

And , as I said in my LG G3 revaluation , MLA works — actually , I think I said it ’s “ The Truth , ” and I bear by that . MLA does a remarkable job of capturing what was once just lose , disconnected light , and port it out to the viewer . The result is a very brilliant overall characterization with a mass of punch . It will daze you . But , if we cut into slimly deep into how the LG G3 sire so bright , it ’s going to come down to the fact that it has a blanched subpixel that act as a sort of brightness booster . That ’s always been the case with LG OLEDs , but with MLA added , it is now more effective .

The Samsung S95C also is an impressively hopeful TV , but it achieves its brightness in a different way . The S95C is bright because it does n’t use a color filter and because its semblance brightness is high .

So which one is the brightest ? Well , that reckon entirely on what ’s on the blind at the moment . Here ’s the most meaningful affair I can say about the brightness between these two TVs : The LG G3 has more sparkle and gleam to it . Scenes with a luck of bright lights and manifestation bedazzle you . The G3 appeals to our love of shiny , glittery things .

The S95C , on the other hired hand , has a richness and depth to it that is also deep satisfying , but in a different way . It ’s the sizzle you get from the flames of a fire , the intensity of the green in a battlefield of grass , or the tonic of colour you get from a field of wildflowers . Woods , surprisingly , have a deeper , more burnished tone to them than they do on the LG G3 .

Here ’s a commonplace metaphor for you : The LG G3 is a snare and soda pop with a spritz of lime . It ’s sparkling , effervescent , and refreshing , but also has some complexity , with intimation of herbaceous plant and flowered accents . The Samsung S95C experience more like an Old Fashioned to me , with mysterious prolificacy , complexity , and a popping of citrus and cherry . In the end , both will get you intoxicated on awesomeness — they just do it in different ways .

Color

I ’ve rival on colour brightness a bit already , but I want to get a little more specific and bring in elements like color saturation and gloss accuracy .

outdoors of using measuring tools , which only order part of the story , getting a read on “ truth ” in color is very difficult unless you have a reference display , like a Sony BVM monitor that Hollywood content Lord practice as sort of “ the out-and-out accuracy . ” If we had one of those , then we could level to it and say : “ That right there is dead correct . ” And knowing that , we could attend at the other two TVs and forecast out which one was skinny to “ correct . ”

I do n’t have a computer address monitoring machine , so I ca n’t do that . Do you have a $ 30,000 cite monitor kicking around in your garage ? Most of you do not . Those of you enunciate yes , give me a ring . I ’d care to take up it .

Anyway , gauge accuracy is important . But just as important is what you like . I believe I sleep together what I care . At least , I did until yesterday . But my own mind was playing tricks on me .

I watched a scene fromMiss Peregrine ’s dwelling for Peculiar Childrenon both TVs . First , I view it on the G3 — and I love it . It attend fantastic . The titulary Miss Peregrine ’s ( Eva Green ) cutis whole tone looked accurate — possibly a little picket , but not wildly off . A child ’s cherry-red hair count natural and pleasing . A garden tantrum had a red brick frontage amid verdant greens that looked awesome . I loved everything I see .

But then , I looked at the same clobber on the S95C.

Green ’s face , for example . On the Samsung S95C , I note more blush in her skin . The grain of the skin look a small more realistic to me . Now , we look at the kid histrion ’s ( Lauren McCrostie ) flushed pilus — wow , it stands out a little more . The red seems a bit more intense to me based on my remembrance . Moreover , I liked how that struck me . I palpate like I just be intimate her hair colour is fervent red . Then I search at the garden scene . This also look good . The brick really pops , as does the greenery . I enjoyed this a quite a little .

Finally , I compared the two side by side to see what happened .

When I take care at the S95C , Green ’s skin on the LG G3 almost seems pale in comparison . And the tike ’s red-faced hair almost looked languish on the G3 compare to the S95C. And the coloration in this scene were a BIT more acute on the S95C too .

Wow , now my effect has changed . When I follow the LG G3 , I did n’t mean Green ’s face looked pale at all . It looked about right to me . What happen ? I ’ll narrate you what happened . My viewpoint was skew because my perspective was forced to careen . When I watch the LG G3 , it looks fantastic . But if I have the S95C doing its thing and I ’m comparing , all I can see are the differences . I ca n’t really see the forest for the trees . I ’m not sure that ’s helpful .

Now , at this point , you might be cerebrate that I prefer the S95C , and in some cases , I do . But there are also some concern . Sometimes the reds on the S95C just seem overcooked . I do n’t know if that ’s because the TV can just be more intense than I ’m used to seeing , or if they really are overcooked a bit . I also do n’t bed what is “ correct , ” either . So , ultimately , I just have to decide which I like best .

And I ’m tell you , I am not trusted . I like so much about both that settle on just one is going to take a lot more clip . I ’m suffering from analysis palsy here , and I do n’t intend that ’s near . I do n’t want you to do the same . It ’s not worth it ! And besides , I have the luxury of sitting with these TVs for a couple of more day , while most shoppers do n’t ! You could always spend 60 minutes at the store and possibly annoy the cut-rate sale comrade — you receive ta do what you got ta do , right ?

But , back to the comparability : We ’ve covered brightness , color , and kind of by default , contrast , because both offer perfect black level . What else can we scrutinise ?

Motion

make your horse , please , I ’m nonplus to the Dolby Vision matter .

allow ’s talk about apparent motion resolution and upscaling . movement firmness because we need a pleasant experience look out both fast and slow - paced action on the sieve , and upscaling because we do n’t always get to watch 4 K HDR high bit - depth content , so we need to know what everyday cable or satellite TV , orYouTube TV , might count like .

I ’ll protrude with upscaling first because , for me , that ’s prosperous . They are monovular in how they manage the hour or so ofTubi TVcontent I take in . I kept skip something would leap out and be notably different , and it never happened .

As for move , they are both excellent . The only difference I saw — and I really had to see for it , whether it was a dim pan in 24 framing - per - second cinematic content or tight - moving sports action — was with one element that I ’ve mentioned in my revaluation in the yesteryear . Sometimes slowly - moving bright objects can produce a strobing or flashing issue due to the instant pixel response time that OLED has . It issue forth from a bit of soma stutter that is present with all TVs , but the instant response of the pixel means that it brightens up straightaway , and because it does , you may see what seems like a flicker or sorting . This is slightly more pronounced on the LG G3 because its white brightness tend to be a piffling more intense .

Folks , I ’m reaching here . The departure is not at all dramatic . And I roll in the hay this is n’t what you want to hear , but it does n’t push me in one direction or another when making a decision on these tv .

Dolby Vision deal breaker?

Next — and this is a bragging , unavoidable factor that I think many of you jazz was issue forth — there’sDolby Vision . The LG G3 supports it , and the S95C does not ( no Samsung TV support Dolby Vision ) . For some of you , that ’s a mint ledgeman . For others of you , you ’re wondering if itshouldbe a hand circuit breaker .

I ’m going to be very straight-from-the-shoulder here : I have not decided for myself if it is a deal breakers .

The answer to that question is one I ’m going to have to dive into deeply and present in another clause . However , for this comparison , what I can tell you is that I watch several titles in Dolby Vision on the LG G3 while watching the same title at the same time inHDR 10on the Samsung S95C.

Why notHDR 10+you inquire ? True , it would be more fair to liken HDR 10 + to Dolby Vision , since they both pop the question active metadata ( that is , theHDRinformation change from one scene to the next , or even frame by frame in some cases ) . But as close as I can tell , there are cherished few scenarios in which you would even have a choice between HDR 10 + and Dolby Vision . There are a handful of exceptions . There are a few 4 K Blu - ray titles that offer both . And onAmazon Prime Video , there are a couple of titles that offer both .

From what I watched , the differences I come across were not deal - breaker - level differences for me .

Most of the time , it ’s an HDR10 - versus - Dolby Vision question . And I watched several deed this way . What I can severalize you is that the difference I saw were not deal - breaker - level differences for me . And besides , I think what I have in terms of picture calibre discrepancies has more to do with how the TV treat the entropy it is suffer than it does with the quality and profundity of the selective information it is getting . SDR to SDR , HDR to HDR , the comparison ends up being about the same differences in character between the video , not the supposed superiority of what Dolby Vision is bringing to the board , which , again , we ’ll fence in a separate post .

If you think thatnothaving Dolby Vision as an option is going to bug you , no matter what practical deviation it does or does not make — if you just want the indemnity that you ’re getting everything you’re able to and the assurance that nothing is result on the tabular array — well , you have two options . you may either go with the LG W - OLED with Dolby Vision , or you may look for theSony A95L , which is the only TV that volunteer both QD - OLED technology and Dolby Vision .

But I ’ll also say that I would not personally go on the S95C because it does n’t propose Dolby Vision . I ’ve not see to it anything that convinces me that Dolby Vision is bringing enough to the G3 to tempt me to that side . So , if you ’re wondering if not having Dolby Vision is a concern enough not to buy the S95C ? My answer is no . It ’s not something that I would have impact my personal decision .

One more matter we have to fling in here : sunburn - in hazard . Look , I guess if you are someone who watches the type of subject matter with static image elements for really long periods of time every day most days of the year , then an OLED TV is not proper for you . But if we ’re talking about overall burn up - in risk , there is some grounds that maneuver to the G3 as being the more resilient of the two in this compare . Otherwise , I have a whole serial ofburn - in videosI advance you to watch to learn more .

The verdict

This is the hardest comparison I ’ve ever done . And I still have n’t decide which TV I would in person put in my room . I do know this , though : No matter which I pick , I ’d be delighted to have it in my home . I ’d definitely need to have the TV calibrated to get the best colour . Specifically , Samsung ’s redness are just a number much for me in the out - of - box seat Filmmaker modes . But I ’d be thrilled to have either one .

I wish the One Connect box seat . I like the Samsung remote control . I like the fertility of color on the S95C.

But I also care the oomph of the LG G3 , I care that it come with a no - break wall mount in the corner , and I like that it supports almost everything there is to affirm .

This may not be the takeaway you wanted , but I suppose this is the takeaway you need : These are both starring TVs . There ’s no winner or loser in the competition for me . Which idiot box you get is pop off to be a very personal decision , and I would urge you to make your enthral the priority . In the end , very few of us are video professionals who take stock a display ’s performance extremely hard and demand something very specific . But take it from someone whohasmade a living out of judge TVs for 13 days now : They are both so safe , that if I were force to make a decision aright now , right in this very bit , I might just have to flip a coin . It ’s a tough call , and I wish you the absolute good when create your decision .