Joe Maring / Digital Trends
OnePlus has made a somewhat major flub regarding the depot ironware of theOnePlus 12R. The 12R is already one of 2024 ’s best smartphones , but it is now receiving quite some heated flack for something OnePlus got wrong . The company advertised that the OnePlus 12R came equipped with a UFS 4.0 storage module when , in reality , it bank on the quondam and dumb UFS 3.1 standard .
“ The OnePlus 12R also still features all the new Trinity Engine features we announce at launching , like launching apps faster than ever and keeping software locked loose for up to 72 60 minutes , and was to the full tested using UFS 3.1 repositing , ” OnePlus President and Chief Operating Officer Kinder Liusaid in an official statement .
Joe Maring / Digital Trends
I am not indisputable how much that command is going to squelch the disappointment of buyers , who may have been swayed by the premise of flagship - tier memory perks on the budget - centric earphone . Liu ’s statement say vendee should turn over out to official OnePlus support channel , but does n’t specify if they will get any form of recompense , either in term of cash or store credits .
This wo n’t be the first time that a smartphone marque has been drag in in such blistering amnionic fluid . When controversy erupted that two major smartphone brands — Samsung and Apple — were purposefully slow up down older phones , the Korean electronics colossus deny it .
But in 2018 , Italian guard dog Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato ( AGCM)fined Samsung and Apple , noting that it found grounds proving that Samsung intentionally slowed down its aged phones . The not - so - guilty - voice term for this practice in the tech diligence is contrive obsolescence .
Undoing the merits of a keen phone .
Now , coming back to OnePlus , it did n’t resist its wrongful conduct , but but take over that it was a caseful of erroneous marketing . However , it could still shoot down the company in legal soup if a buyer decides to drag the brand to a consumer court over claims of misleading advertising . disregarding of the repercussion , the gulf between UFS 3.1 and UFS 4.0 is n’t really worth ignoring .
Why UFS 4.0 is a big deal
Let ’s originate with the most obvious departure . The operation form also depend on the firebrand that made these storage module . Micronclaimssequential read and write speeding of up to 4,300MB / s and 4,000MB / s , severally . Those numbers are basically twice the might of UFS 3.1 warehousing check . Samsung , on the other hand , toutssequential read and pen speeds of 4,200 Mbit / s and 2,800 MB / s , severally .
Now , it ’s not just the naked pep pill that matters here . With every new generation , there are some all-important gains in other aspects , include power efficiency . “ UFS 4.0 will deliver a sequential read swiftness of up to 6.0 MB / s per mA ( mA ) , representing a 46%t betterment over UFS 3.1 , ” claims Samsung .
Samsung ’s UFS 4.0 storage mental faculty alsoembracedAdvanced RPMB ( Replay Protected Memory Block ) , which is touted to be nearly twice as capable of safeguarding sensitive on - twist information such as passwords and personal exposure . On the more useable side of thing , UFS 4.0 pelt along up app launches , foreshorten latency , and also lead to a libertine bootup .
An improved storage mental faculty enhances the user experience by enabling smoother changeover between various apps , thanks to reduced UFS latency . It also boosts performance significantly during rapid photo shoot or when produce composite image such as panoramas , owing to its greater memory port bandwidth .
The OnePlus 12R is still a very degenerate and adequate to smartphone even with its older UFS 3.1 storage , but it does n’t have the UFS 4.0 hurrying OnePlus earlier exact that it did . The 12R is still an excellent speech sound , but the whole situation does slightly tarnish what is an otherwise excellent outlet from the company .
