Sam Altman thinks GPT-5 will be smarter than him — but what does that mean?

Sam Altman did apanel discussionat Technische Universität Berlin last week , where he prognosticate that ChatGPT-5 would be smarter than him — or more accurately , that he would n’t be smarter thanGPT-5 .

He also did a second with the interview , ask who look at themselves smarter than GPT-4 , and who thinks they will also be smarter than GPT-5 .

“ I do n’t think I ’m run to be smarter than GPT-5 . And I do n’t feel sorry about it because I think it just means that we ’ll be able to employ it to do unbelievable thing . And you know like we want more scientific discipline to get done . We want more , we want to enable researchers to do thing they could n’t do before . This is the history of , this is like the prospicient story of humankind . ”

The whole affair seemed rather prepared , specially since he forced it into a response to a fair unrelated query . The emcee asked about his expectations when partnering with inquiry organizations , and he respond “ Uh … There are many reasons I am excited about AI . … The exclusive affair I ’m most excited about is what this is going to do for scientific discovery . ”

He did n’t answer the host ’s question at any point during his answer , and he also did n’t give any details or account regarding his scuttlebutt . What does it mean for GPT-5 to besmarter than Sam Altman ?

Does it mean GPT-5 will be cultivate on data pass over in - astuteness knowledge of more subjects than Altman has experience with ? That ’s believably already the display case with GPT-4 but people do n’t describe it as smart because it ’s so risky at following instructions , retain context , and revising its response .

So , can we bear GPT-5 to better in this area ? It should n’t be impossible — my experience withDeepSeek , for example , has been much more positively charged in this area . If I involve for no more than 100 words , two bullet train - point list , and info take from a certain connectedness , it in reality delivers .

Then , when I ask it to add an special subdivision summarizing an additional web page I cater — I get what I take for . I ’ve never been capable to achieve this kind of smooth and accurate operation withGPT-4 , and I ’m not even asking for anything complicated .

These are the sort of things I turn over when assessing how “ overbold ” I imagine an AI model is but it ’s impossible to know what kind of criterion Altman judges by . He keeps talking about science and research — he even name bring around cancer at one point — but it ’s hard to see how ChatGPT fits into such thing .

I can see how hokey intelligence as a whole might bring , but an Master of Laws ? The prescribed site for ChatGPT report it as a brainstorming partner , a meeting summarizer , a computer code generator , and a mode to search the web . Which of these features will meaningfully help a research scientist deal with questions no human has the resolution to yet ?

If Altman has thoughts or answers on these subject , he is n’t sharing them . He just sticks to sweeping statement that only fathom impressive until you realize you have no idea what he in reality means in practical term .