On today ’s instalment of You Asked , tiny hotel way variation : 4 yard OLED versus 8 K miniskirt - LED . Are build - in TV streaming apps better for picture quality than an external streamer ? Is the Bravia 9 going to be good than an OLED ? And LG C3 versus Hisense U8N — which should you bribe ?
Before we stab in : patently , I ’m still on the road and I ’ve moved to a dissimilar hotel — this one encounter to be pretty minuscule . I ’ve in reality stayed here before , and it ’s a clever elbow room with a great purview . But it ’s a picayune tricky for video .
Is Sony Bravia 9 better than an OLED?
Mauricio Hernandez writes : They say OLED is the best in terminus of picture quality as of now . But do you reckon the Bravia 9 mini - LED will look even better than the Bravia 8 or any OLED ?
That is a super - hard interrogation to respond because whileI have seen a controlled demo of the 2024 Bravia 9 — also known as the XR90 — I have not thoroughly tested it . It ’s hard to answer because when you say “ look even well ” than an organic light-emitting diode , my question is by what amount ? Will its black levels be as respectable ? No . All LCD TVswill have blooming to some degree . It ’s inescapable , and you ca n’t beat pixel - grade dimming . But in terms of overall luminousness and contrast ? The Bravia 9 may dazzle more citizenry than all but the brightest OLED . It comes down to what is “ adept ” for whom ?
If we make it strictly nonsubjective and use a reference monitor as a footing for equivalence to a monetary standard , I conceive the Bravia 9 could get closer than any mini - LED TV on the market . But will it best an OLED under those condition ? I do not think so . I think most video professionals would key the organic light-emitting diode as the ranking TV for accuracy and adhesiveness to Godhead ’s intent in most categories . But just because a crew of video pros say it ’s the best does n’t mean it is the good for you .
4K OLED vs. 8K mini-LED
Jake spell : Would a top - of - the - line 4 1000 OLED TV look beneficial than an 8 K LED tv set expose 4 K content on Netflix ?
Hopefully , from my last answer , you’re able to get a feel for how that question is a small open - terminated . At most screen size , I ’d take a 4 K OLED over an 8 G mini - lead LCD boob tube in almost every case — specially if that 4 potassium organic light-emitting diode were theLG G4orSamsung S95D. But , obviously , there are a lot of other factor at gambling . Which 8 K LCD boob tube are we let the cat out of the bag about ? Which OLED TV are we talk about ? What element of impression lineament mean most to you ? How would you rank them top to bottom ?
But , at the same screen door size of it , I bet that if you put a premium 4 chiliad OLED next to even the effective 8 K LCD , most folks would be more enticed by the OLED .
Are built-in TV streaming apps better for picture quality?
Elisamuel Pedraza writes : Does pour directly from the TV ’s system give better picture timber than link a pour gadget ? Or do you advocate get something like an Apple TV box to get the good picture quality experience ?
All things being adequate , streaming from the TV ’s built - in OS does not necessarily offer better picture lineament than a separate streaming gadget . Unfortunately , all things never are equal . If the streaming gimmick you are talk about is extremely cheap , it may not support some picture quality - related features likeDolby Vision or HDR 10 + . There are other considerations not link to picture quality in which the establish - in streaming app might be better than an cheap streaming box or stick . For example : A TV might be capable to deliverDolby Atmosfrom the streaming app , but it might not clear Dolby Atmos from an incoming HDMI signal . But that is getting to be a pretty rarefied scenario these day .
To make this simple : If I could persuade everyone to buy anApple TV 4 K , I would . Not everyone need to get involve in the Apple ecosystem , and I get that . But in my opinion , there is no well streaming gadget on the market correctly now . All youNvidia Shieldlovers out there , please steady down . I know the Shield can do some things the Apple TV ca n’t . But , on the whole , the Apple TV is the best bet .
Do people really want accurate TVs?
Northern Assasin writes : What percentage of people — even those who do their inquiry — are really interested with absolute accuracy ? My guess is very few . Most people want a undimmed and colorful picture without going too far , like what Vivid fashion introduces .
Mr. Assasin – I consort with you 100 % . Most people are not concerned with accuracy . In fact , setting average characterization level values often ends up make a TV look too dim in a brighter viewing surround , which is why I consider the whimsy of “ truth ” gets misconstrued with dull or lifeless . In truth , precise television set are not at all leaden and lifeless — if that truth is also pair to the viewing environs . And that ’s why I suppose automobile brightness and automobile white balance features are becoming increasingly popular .
So , yes , it ’s true . Most buyers — even those doing research — would n’t necessarily know precise versus inaccurate , even in a side - by - side comparison . They ’d just pick the TV with the picture that excites them .
Should I buy an LG C3 or wait?
PJ writes : I ’m in a pickle . I ’m appear at the LG C3 on sale . Should I wait until crepuscule for the LG G3 / C4 to go on sales event ? Or should I just pull the initiation and get the LG C3 . take down that I gain a $ 750 gift bill of fare to Best Buy from work , and I set aside some money as well . So I want to make trusted I get the best eruption for my clam !
This actually ties into the next interrogation I ’m going to answer . The 2023 TVs are only become to be on sale for as long as they are still in stock . As far as I ’m mindful , there are n’t going to be more shipment to bargainer and retailers . So while I intend we ’ll see models like theLG C3and maybe theLG G3hanging out for a few more months , they wo n’t be around forever . So if you ’re going to purchase a 2023 TV , it ’s best to corrupt it rather than later . I do not see the toll dropping on these TVs by much more — $ 100 , maybe $ 200 at best ? And then they will be gone rapidly .
If the comparison is between a C3 and a C4 , I ’d say salve some money and get the C3 . I have n’t reviewed it yet , but I do n’t know that the C4 is going to offer a enormous improvement on the C3 — probably not enough for youto pass on the savings or spend a long time hold off for the C4 to discharge to the price you see the C3 at now .
But you also tossed the LG G3 OLED in there . If it is within your means to buy the LG G3 right now , I would do so and not take care back . The G4 is a illustrious improvement on the G3 in a few areas that enthusiasts care about , but it is enough improved over the C3 and C4 that it ’s the smartest steal for someone who want top - grade characterisation quality at the best possible cost . So I ’d get the G3 , and I mean you will be thrilled with that option .
LG C3 vs. Hisense U8N
And , finally , the one I think a circle of you have been waiting for . The LG C3 versus Hisense U8N. We ’ve pay back Tyler Calhoun write in : Why would I buy the 65 - inch Hisense U8N if I can get an LG C3 for $ 1,500 ? organic light-emitting diode seems like the obvious selection here . And Van Vuong wrote : The U8N 65 - inch version costs the same as the LG C3 65 - inch . Why not just get the OLED ?
Those are , by far , the most popular questions I ’ve gotten over the past few weeks . And those are just two example I cherry - pluck .
plump back to Northern Assasin ’s observation above , we enthusiasts would do well to remember that we ’re in a nonage when it come to what we need and want from a TV . We ’re in a small club here — it ’s a cool club and I love being part of it with you . But most folks are expect for a brilliant , beautiful telecasting available at a really honorable terms and do n’t drop a lot of clip thinking about EOTF trailing , thoroughgoing black levels , and color accuracy . I consider most folks out there have a go at it what spoiled looks like , and they do n’t want that . But once you get to a sure tier of calibre , it will exceed their outlook , especially if they are upgrading from an older television .
But there are some concrete reason someone might want something like theHisense U8KorHisense U8Ninstead of the LG C3 at the same price . The U8 K and U8N get significantly bright than the C3 , and that luminosity come in really ready to hand for daylight wake in a common living way setting . Also , I have heard from a mess of people who routinely allow their TV on all day long . Sometimes as background noise , sometimes to flirt with the pet , sometimes because folks like watching CNN or Fox News all day . And that kind of viewing is a no - go for OLED . It will finally make some burn - in .
The Hisense U8 K and the newer U8N are the proficient choices for those people .
Now , to be clean and complete , there are understanding other than icon timber that the LG C3 might be the better goggle box from a drug user - experience perspective . But , having speak to a good number of U8 owner over the past few old age , the immense majority have been thrilled with their purchase . It ’s true , you ’ll obtain reports of premature failure for just about any TV model , and you may hear more about Hisense TV failures than LG C3 failures . But that ’s potential because there are far more people corrupt U8s than C3s . So that ’s bound to happen .
But if you are an enthusiast and super brightness is not something you involve or want — and your viewing behavior does n’t make you a danger for sunburn - in — the LG C3 at $ , 1500 is just an awing slew , and I would n’t hesitate for a second to make that purchase .
