What ’s the one thing folks are n’t talking about when it comes to giant 100 - plus - inch TVs ? How do you incur a telecasting calibrator these mean solar day ? Will we ever get a telly that can get all the colors ? And … is Sony really quitting OLED ?
Home theater setup challenges
This first question is n’t a question so much as a comment , but it bear on to a late installment centre around projectors .
It comes from Daniel Kelleher , who said : The one thing that no one talk of the town about is where the nitty-gritty audio channel would go if you have a 5.1 or larger system . With a 100 - inch TV , you would pretty much have to put your center channel on the storey or ceiling . Even a soundbar would be passing low to the undercoat as the television pretty much takes up the whole wall . So , audio frequency is very compromised . If it were n’t for that , my next video recording element would be a video .
Daniel also shared images of his setup and observe he uses an acoustically pellucid concealment to get his center channel behind the screen when it is drop down . It ’s also already below his TV when not using the projector .
You ’re right ! So , allow ’s talk about it . I think Daniel brings up a great point here . One of the challenge with with child screens , whether a TV screen or aprojection screen , is that the bigger the screen door gets , the lower or higher the center channel speaker will have to be placed — unless you use an acoustically transparent filmdom where the auditory sensation of the speaker can go justly through the screen . just like in a commercial flick house .
I ’ve have this issuance myself , really . I think it is an specially big challenge withultr shortsighted throw projectors . The projector often goes where a center canal might go . And even if you mount the center canal directly below the silver screen , there ’s always the chance that if you do n’t have it all set up just mighty , the center canal could block some of the luminosity from the projector or , if the speaker has a gloss destination , it will terminate up chew over some of the visible radiation coming from the screen door .
There are a number of challenges with large - screen data format . But with at least some projector setups , an acoustically crystal clear screenland allows a center channel to output sound closer to where the voices and actions look on the screen . We call that anchoring the sound to the blind .
So what ’s the solution in the grammatical case of a TV ? You ca n’t put anything behind it . So you ’ll indeed have to put a centerfield channel above or below the TV . as luck would have it , in my experience , the psyche is pretty good at pretend accommodations . If you let your psyche relax a mo , you may get to the peak where the dangling of mental rejection is n’t ruin by have the dialogue come from below or above where you see a person ’s mouth . It ’s over-the-top how your brain will make it work for you if you let it . If you could let go of your frustration that the speaker is just below or above the image , your brain will associate the phone with the epitome . But I also love folks who just ca n’t do it .
So , what then ? I ’m just imagining things here , but with an OLED , QDEL — or maybe even microLED — you may grow the screen into a mellow - quality speaker that ’s guiding enough to be effective . You may have a center channel that is n’t perfectly voice - matched to the rest of your speakers , but at least the speech sound is literally number from the screen in that example . Some of Sony ’s OLED tv set do this now .
But for any backlit television , that is n’t potential . The boob tube ’s speaker system of rules would need to become a prominent priority . It would require to have a soundstrip at the bottom and audio processing that essentially “ lifts ” the speech sound using psychoacoustics to make it seem like the sound was coming from that CRT screen . I think that can be done , but it ’s going to take time , money , and intention . I guess now is the time to start involve tv set manufacturers to make the TV audio a big antecedency for home theater enthusiasts . And honestly . that does n’t seem like a big ask to me since these are super - premium TVs and already cost a humble fortune . You might as well go for broke while you ’re go break and get a decorous sound system out of the TV .
Outside of that , it ’s going to be a via media . which , in the end , is n’t a ridiculous ask . Home theater systems are interpenetrate with demands for via media , are n’t they ?
In-home TV calibration
The next doubtfulness comes from Nathan McGraw , who writes : I late built my dream ( to me ) home theater , and I ’d care to cognize if I ’m getting the best visual and audio experience . How can I go about find a calibrator in my area ? what is more , in your opinion , do you believe having a professional calibrator occur out is money well spent , or can you get away with the build - in auto setups ?
Nathan , I am so glad you put this interrogation in front of me this week because I ’ve needed to declare oneself some supporter around this for a long time . I get asked all the clip : How do I find a calibrator in my area or one who is coming through my area or willing to come to me ?
First , please know that I sympathize — and I want everyone else to realise this , too — that Google is not very helpful on this . you could be an ultra - pro certified Googler and come up with bupkis when searching for a calibrator .
The next matter I want to do is call aid to the fact that display standardization — whether for a TV or projector — and audio standardisation are two dissimilar things , and it is not uncommon to find a calibrator that does displays , but not audio frequency or vice versa . Obviously , it would be enceinte to obtain one individual who is a legit expert at both . But even finding legit experts can be tricky !
The next important matter to know is that audio standardisation is less … have ’s say , “ resourcefulness intensive ” than video calibration . Audio standardization is easier and less expensive to DIY than television calibration , just because the prick to do audio standardization are less expensive . The artistry of audio calibration is still a specialized skill , and I ’m not here to say audio standardization is easier than video recording standardisation . But I will say that , from a price linear perspective , it ’s less expensive to get the putz you need to perform audio calibration , and from there , it ’s all about how much willingness you have to school yourself online and get the line of work done .
video recording standardization — done well — expect very expensive tools . you may get by with formula on a magnetic disk or download some file to a USB instead of buying a design generator . Ultimately , you ’ll call for the software ( I useCalman by Portrait Displaysexclusively ) and at least a colorimeter , and even those run into the thousands of dollars at the gloomy final stage .
With all of that understood , you’re able to see why it will be wanton and less expensive to have a pro come out and take care of it for you . But how do you find that pro ?
One way is through anAVS forum thread with a running database on custom installers , listed in order by the state in which they mesh .
Another option is to go through theImaging Science Foundation ( ISF ) database of calibrators . You do n’t have to have ISF certification to be a near calibrator , and you also are n’t necessarily a dear calibrator just because you have ISF certification . Still , it ’s a expert start decimal point to at least find names and businesses so you may do some enquiry into reviews of their work . And that ’s the key here . Look up reviews of the folks you ’re considering using . You do n’t require a hack plumber work on your tube , and you do n’t want a taxicab calibrator doing a meh Book of Job on your organization .
Another approach is to go to theCEDIA websiteand look for contractor there . CEDIA stands for Custom Electronic Design and Installation Association , and it puts on an annual trade wind show that I sometimes serve . It ’s one of my favorite shows . It run ongoing education seminars , certification training , etc . you’re able to probably find some CEDIA - attest experts in your orbit through the CEDIA web site .
You could also prove calling local place - house shops in your area . Even if they are n’t in your city , a family house specializer shop class in your state may have calibrators they work with or others that they can advocate .
Before I move on to the next question , I ’ll add together that I am hopeful that we can cultivate a raw crop of calibrators . Home amusement exuberance is on the ascension , and we will require new blood in this profession . It ’s a very recession vocation chance , but a unspoiled one and a fun one if you call for me .
Running the color gamut
Jamie Dewbury compose : A common stat for TVs is the part of colour gamut , so I ask the followers : 1 . ) How long , if ever , will it take to see a TV that reaches 100 % ? 2 . ) Why is there a vast section of green tones always outside the triangular measurement area ?
So , first things first , what is color gamut?Color gamutis a terminus we ’ve descend up with to line the range of colour that a twist can display or register , proportional to the total reach of colors that is within the seeable spectrum .
commonly , we see this visually expressed on a chart like this .
The sort of triangular colour blob represents the visible colouring spectrum , and the triangle within it comprise the color gamut .
There are a bunch of unlike color gamut , and they ’ve been given names . On the low terminal , we have the NTSC color gamut , which was developed in 1953 as a criterion for broadcast television system . Then we move up to sRGB , also known as Rec . 709 , which is the measure we have for SDR television these days . There ’s also Adobe RGB , DCI P3 , and finally , Rec . 2020 ( the one with the most colors in it ) .
Who developed and delineate these people of colour gamuts is another topic for another day . For now , I recall it ’s most important to mention that in TV circles , we lean to verbalise about Rec . 709 for SDR , and then DCI P3 for cinema or HDR . Finally , Rec . 2020 is sort of this holy Sangraal color gamut for the last several years .
Right now , the Rec . 2020 colouring material gamut is still the big , unfearing , aspirational finish . The best consumer display powerful now — like theSony A95L — oversee to get to the low 90 % area for reportage . That ’s kind of a big deal because for a foresighted time , we were stuck down in the mid 70s . There have been prototype displays that buzz off to 95 % , though .
I would like to think we are maybe five years or so from consumer displays pushing the Rec . 2020 envelope . That ’s just a guess , though . I ’d have sex to be surprised and see it sooner than that .
As for your question about green . Why is there so much more unripened outside the Triangulum than the other colors ?
I will be wholly gauzy and say you this variety of semblance scientific discipline thing is a chip over my straits . What I do live is that the human eye is more tender to certain wavelength of Light Within than others . I also know that TVs use red , immature , and blue color primary coil — RGB ! — and that each of those people of colour is represented by a very specific number on an disco biscuit and Y axis . For the red , gullible , and disconsolate to combine and make the most colors possible , a specific note value for green must be assigned . And I imagine that particular note value leaves some of the green spectrum behind .
That is as far as I ’m going to take that , but I treasure the dubiousness because you ’ve made me funny , and I ’m blend in to take every chance I can to learn more !
Is Sony abandoning OLED?
at long last , a query I had a feeling would be a thing , despite my frustration that it never should have been in the first berth .
The question comes from Alejandro Rodriguez , who inquire : So is Sony really vacate OLED ? They had the best on the market .
Sony is not abandoning OLED . Please calm down . I ’m not here to play a blame game , but here ’s why the question that never should have been a question has come up : A YouTuber I respect very much , Vincent Teoh , published a telecasting titled “ Sony Plan to ditch OLED & use mini - lead for 2024 flagship TV . Here ’s why . ”
I would argue that the job should n’t be attribute to that newspaper headline . The problem is that some folks did n’t see the whole video and understand what Vincent was saying . Instead , they took to forums and start spreading misinformation by parroting that headline out of context .
And , well , it excite up a minute of dealings . So others started hopping on the bandwagon to seek to get in on that traffic or rack up those views .
I boost you to check that telecasting . But here ’s my take :
Vincent and I were on the same press trip as guest of Sony in Tokyo . Part of what we learned there is thatSony is lean hard into its mini - LED backlight technologyand is targeting a mini - LED backlit LCD to be market as its flagship .
Now , I do n’t have time for a argumentation on what the terminal figure “ flagship”shouldmean . But what I will say is that what you consider flagship to mean and what the marketing gurus at corporations like to use the full term flagship for are often cash in one’s chips to be very different things . I intend , Samsung never called itsQD - OLED TVsits “ flagship . ” But I opine many TV enthusiast would say , “ Uh , no , sorry , Samsung , your marketing team is amiss — theS95Cis your flagship TV . ”
Sony is n’t quitting OLED . I think it made theA95L OLEDso commodity , and the QD - OLED engineering science is at a spot where incremental generational improvements are so small , that trying to cram another OLED TV into the line in 2024 — an A95 M , or N , or whatever — just does n’t make sense . Also , keep in head that the A95L come out belatedly in 2023 , and some would argue it search and perform like a TV we would expect to see in 2024 .
No , Sony has an opportunity to reestablish some dominance in themini - lead TVspace by coming out with a mini - lead TV that is so good that it just trounces the contender . That expand its sales , and that ’s undecomposed for the company .
The A95L is much sell itself . It does n’t need help . It sweep most award and shootouts across the Earth .
TheX90L , X93L andX95L ? They did n’t get most as much attention in 2023 . I suspect that we will be talk a lot about the new versions ofthoseTVs in 2024 .
So , again , Sony is n’t ditching OLED . It is perhaps just not making it a massive priority for 2024 . Even Sony is n’t unhinged enough to take the best television of 2023 , deplume it off the market , and say , “ We just did that to prove we could , ” then drop the mic and take the air out of the way .
