Can QLED and mini - precede TVs get tan - in ? How can you solve the job of not getting HDR from the YouTube app on Apple TV 4 K ? Speaking of Apple TV 4 K , does it benefit from HDMI 2.1 ? And is using a reckoner proctor instead of a smart television receiver a beneficial way of life to avoid seclusion issues ?
Apple TV and HDMI 2.1
Tom Sampson writes : Is there any welfare to using my Apple TV 4 thousand in a 2.1 HDMI port wine versus 2.0 ?
No . There is no benefit to using anHDMI 2.1port for an Apple TV 4K. The only consumer hardware I ’m mindful of that benefit from the bandwidth afford by HDMI 2.1 port wine are the Xbox Series X , PlayStation 5 , and high - end PCs pushing 4 K 120Hz TV signal or 8 kB 60Hz TV signaling .
Dolby Atmos without surround
Andrew Lopez writes : My married woman and I watch most of our moving-picture show in bed in our sleeping room . We have a JBL 2.1 soundbar with a subwoofer , but I ’ve always woolgather of a more immersive sound experience . I do n’t opine rear surrounds would work on because our headboard is already against the rampart . Any way to get around this , or should I just go for a soundbar like the Sonos Arc with virtual Dolby Atmos ?
I also have a sleeping room in which the headboard is up against the bulwark face-to-face of the TV . And I recognize a raft of you question whether surround speakers will do anything good for you if , say , your couch is up against a wall . So here ’s my take on that .
While you will not get all of the benefits of properly placed and spaced surroundings speaker unit — relative to your listening position — when your back ’s up against the bulwark , you’re able to still get some benefit from throw beleaguer speaker unit on your bedside mesa . You get a short flake of side filling , and if you could send them even further out to the side — say , 4 feet from each principal as one sits on the layer or lounge — then you wo n’t have to turn them down quite as much to keep them from seeming like they are the right way next to your forefront . But even on a bedside table or nightstand , I was able-bodied to dial down my surroundings verbaliser so they enhanced the overall sound field without being a distraction . I definitely favour take them tonothaving them .
Again , you are n’t get the full , intended , or best surround orAtmoseffect . But you are getting a slight something , and I opt have it to not having it .
With all that said , you may often save yourself some money by throw overboard the surround speakers and rather getting asoundbarwith upfiring driver and side - give the axe driver , which can provide some decent practical surroundings and reflected environment core . TheSonos Arcis a corking example of such a soundbar . But there are others out there . The tonality is in the number . As an example , remember the first number in , countenance ’s say , a 5.1.2 arrangement . The first telephone number represents the main channel , the second number correspond the subwoofer , and the third turn refers to the Atmos or height effect channels . So what you want to take care for is a 3.1.2 , 5.1.2 , 7.1.2 , or even 9.1.2 organization . Look for those descriptions on a soundbar that does not include surround speakers , and that will be an reading that it stomach Atmos from the soundbar itself .
HDR is missing on the YouTube app
Dustin Stacey write : My head is about YouTube HDR . If I play it through my Apple TV , it does n’t play in HDR . So would it look better if I played it through the TV app that does make for the HDR ? Not certain if the condensation of YouTube will make it so that it does n’t matter either way .
There is no ground you should not be gettingHDRfrom the YouTube app on yourApple television receiver 4K. If you are 100 % sure the content you are watching is in HDR — do n’t just trust the championship of the television , sometimes those lie — then my proficient guess is that there is a place amiss in your Apple TV . I am curious whether you ’re getting HDR from other stream apps , though . Sounds like you ’re just having a problem with YouTube .
Anyway , try going toSettings > Video and Audio > Match Content > Match Dynamic Range : wrick that on to have Apple TV 4 one thousand match its output to whatever the dynamical scope of the content you ’re learn happens to be . If you still do n’t get HDR from a TV you know for certain is in HDR , then the trouble resides elsewhere . But that is not a problem constitutional to the Apple TV 4K.
Computer monitor vs. smart TV for privacy
Gary Eichelberger writes : I read that it is potential to purchase a data processor admonisher instead of a smart TV if one is using a well out machine or PC as the server for content . Is this feasible ? Not a lot of orotund screens are available this direction , but there are a few in the 40 - column inch plus range last I bet . They be more than the smart TVs ( which are now unbelievably cheap ) , but the monitor lizard I saw on Amazon still costs less than the plasma television receiver I got a decade ago . I frankly just do n’t really bank that disenable the impudent feature really prevents datum collection .
I did this for a while . I used a KTC OLED monitor with aChromecast with Google TVconnected to it , and it did study . The issue with monitors is that they do n’t have picture processing in them . Maybe that ’s not an issue if you ’re using a PC , where image processing is taken fear of by whatever GPU you have in that machine . But cyclosis boxwood and stick do n’t have much in the means of picture processing — they trust on a video to do that chore — and you might find that not everything you watch calculate all that enceinte because you have a monitor that is n’t seek to clean up any noise or other artifacts . It ’s also not upscaling ( unless you ’re using an Nvidia Shield , which does its own upscaling ) and most varan speakers are terrible if they even have them — even worse than lousy TV utterer , so you ’re in all probability looking at feature to get some kind of audio answer .
But here ’s the thing : There ’s not much difference between usingAndroid TV , Google TV , Roku , or Fire television organization , whether they are built into a TV or an external gadget . Same streaming OS , same privacy concerns . So , maybe you get better privacy using a PC if you ’ve sire it locked down really well , but any other cyclosis boxful or control stick will hail with the same concealment concern as if that platform were built into the smart idiot box . The only exceptions are Samsung ’s Tizen and LG ’s webOS , which are available only in streaming box or stick form .
Sonos Era 300 upgrade
Darink 24 wonders : I currently have the Sonos Arc , the Sub , and two Sonos Ones in the back of the living room for surround effect . Would it be deserving it to replace my Ones with two Era 300 ’s ? If so , why ?
So , I do n’t experience if it would be “ worth it ” to you . I can say that I would dead make that upgrade , and the reason why is that the Atmos effects and overall Atmos enhancement that you would get from a duad ofEra 300sis going to represent a significant advance in your system strait . At least , I remember it is a significant advance . That presumes you do n’t have them on a bookshelf where the upfiring drivers ca n’t do their occupation . But yeah , I would 100 % do that elevate when it is financially practicable .
Mini-LED burn-in
DJTeknovibe AK : Can you get burn - in on QLED and mini light-emitting diode TVs ?
Let ’s first recognize that LED , QLED , and mini - LED are alldifferent eccentric of LCD TVs . They all have liquid crystal display panels in them .
To answer the question decent , I will have to get a bit donnish . liquid crystal display TVs are not susceptible to “ burn - in ” by the normally accepted definition of the term .
combust - in is a terminal figure that was mint back in the CRT television set days when cathode beam tube show were used for computer monitors , TV arcade console , and even commercial displays . What happened was that the phosphors coating the back of the telly looking glass were burnt up by the cathode electron beam metro in the tv set , causing a ” burned - in ” image .
That term bear through to plasma video and now OLED TVs . Technically , it is an inaccurate verbal description of what is taking place . When blood plasma and OLED TVs get a burned - in image , it ’s because the phosphorescent gas in blood plasma or the organic compounds in organic light-emitting diode in sure function of the screen wear down out faster than in palisade orbit . So , it ’s more like “ burn - out , ” really .
you’re able to think of an LCD cellphone as a lilliputian genus Lens that lets light through when it ’s unfastened and close off light when it is closed . It ca n’t really burn in . It can get stuck , but that ’s a dissimilar return . Anyway , you ca n’t burn the CNN logo on your LCD TV . However , the longer and harder you drive an LCD TV , the more the LCD cells and other share of the TV will wear out . You may start seeing some vignetting around the edge and corner of the TV . You may see the image on the television receiver getting thudding after a preposterous routine of hr of use . But you will not get “ burn - in ”
Vision Pro audio
Joe S wants to know : Is it safe to assume that the Vision Pro withAirPods Proused for audi , is not lead to be able to give you that seat - rumbling , high - pressure biff - in - the - chest feeling that you could get from a right speaker system - based audio system with high - quality subwoofers .
Yes , that is true . Earbuds and even headphones ca n’t hit you in the breast with sound . You take to move a fate of air for that concussive force . You will get a sense of evenhandedly cryptic bass and impact when you hear to headphones and theAirPods Pro — they ’re OK for bass , I suppose . But you need large stop moving air all around you to really feel it .
I would have it off to see some fashion to integrate bass transducer — sometimes call bass shakers — to give theVision Pro experiencea little more visceral effect . But even then , it ’s still not the same as having subwoofers that shake you and the thing around you .
Signal splitting
Brad Hornick asks : I have two 4 K OLED TVs that I would like to rive an HDMI source sign ( satellite liquidator ) with . One TV requires a 6 - infantry cablegram to the source , and the other a 30 - substructure cable television to the source . Any testimonial on a rail-splitter and a 30 - foot overseas telegram solution ?
I would get theMonoprice Blackbird 4 K 1 by 2 amplifier splitterfor $ 20 and then get yourself somehigh - lineament HDMI cables . Monoprice happens to trade those , too . With the amplified splitter , you’re able to probably get aside without using an fighting HDMI cable . But if you have hassle with signal drop out at that more distant TV , even with the amplified splitter , springtime for anactive fibre visual HDMI cable . They are a bit more pricey , but it will do the job even beyond 30 feet .
