On today ’s You ask : From miniskirt to micro to nano — what ’s next , and what ’s with those Word of God ? Also , how do you know if a tv set has a great radio receiver ? Are more audio review article come ?
The trouble with tuners
Jim from “ the middle of OTA nowhere ” ( Asheville , NC ) , spell : First , does anyone test the tuners in TVs for the ability to rip distant stations and stability ? Are there any set - top boxes that are fuck for having very good tuners?Second , the 2024 TCL 75 - column inch QM8 is going for $ 1,300 right now — the same as the newQM6K. Which would be a right buy for sports ? I have no utilisation for the soundbar they are make on the pre - order .
First off , Asheville is beautiful ! Who needs OTA TV when nature ’s TV is right out your front threshold ? I ’m kidding , of course .
Does anyone quiz the tuners in telecasting for the ability to pull remote station and keep them stable ? Not as far as I ’m aware . Consumer Reports used to periodically include account on tuner examination , but I do n’t experience if they still do . ( Suggestion : Ping Jim Wilcox there , say him that Caleb sent you , and ask him to advocate for you . )
TV tuner testing is challenging because it ’s very specific , and the quizzer needs to be in just the perfect spot : a place where a sign is approachable but hard to get . Then TVs require to be rank based on how well they pull in that signaling . Without breaking into the TV tuner ’s glasses and knowing the input sensitivity rating , I ’m not sure how you could square up on newspaper which television might have a superior tuner for your particular case .
The good stake ? Having a greatTV antennain the right place , with the ability to shoot for it , is right smart more good than relying on a tuner to pull out in a post . A tuner can be more sore and it could be good at operate on that signal . However , if the signal itself is dodgy it ’s not like an amplifier or radio set can make it better .
break this is a precedency for you , I imagine you in all probability already have the skilful possible antenna or aerial . I ca n’t aid determine the best tuners because I am in a blank space where grow local stations is fairly easy . grueling - to - get stations are often a upshot of geographics dumbfound in the way .
Dedicated tuner box may not be better than every built - in radio , but they have one chore – so hopefully they ’re build up to be as good as potential . I have not tested them myself but I learn the SilicondustHDHomeRuntuners are honest as are those made by TBS — the 5520SE specifically .
As for 2024 QM8 vs. QM6 K ? I have n’t prove the QM6 K yet ( it ’s come ) . However , I ’d put money on the QM8 being better . If you ca n’t hold off , bribe the QM8 while you still can — with TCL ’s current Super Bowl sale , it ’s belike as inexpensive right now as it ever will be .
Wanted: more audio reviews
Chris in Vancouver , BC writes : Your channel in recent year has changed focal point from AVR equipment in general to TVs and blue-ribbon high - end soundbars — almost alone it seems . The reviews for thing like earbuds and earpiece seemed to dwindle in 2024 . More relevant to my dubiousness , reviews on place theatre sound equipment have been non - actual . Your TV do reference AVRs , and your set always shows off a revolving set of verbalizer ( and always makes me want to get wind more about them ) . understandably the channel picture the grandness and popularity of these point for a full theater experience . Is there any chance we could commence to see more reviews of audio equipment , consumer ground level speakers , AVRs , A , and preamps in the future ?
It ’s true that over clip we have become more and more focused on video . The reason is rather involved , but just put : We get way , mode more view on TV content than audio substance . Similarly , we get far more views on soundbars and accessible surround systems like theBravia Theater Quadthan we do on more conventional speakers , receivers , adenosine monophosphate , digital - to - parallel converter ( DACs ) , etc .
Lest you intend we are just in it for the money … no , that is n’t the case . We do have to run a profitable business enterprise and I have make out to chip at out a corner in goggle box and TV in general , so , as you’re able to suppose , that ’s become a core part of my business sector on YouTube .
However , nobody would like more of the “ A ” in our A / V insurance coverage than me . I am a instrumentalist and a low - key audiophile . I lie with everything about at - home base music listening . give a budget , I will pass more on my audio system than my telly if force to choose between the two .
justly now , I can make about three videos a week on average . You Askedis one of them . That leaves two videos . One is usually a TV review . Another may be a telly unboxing , or as you luff out , audio gear that a lot of folks want to learn about or buy .
Could I do more high - conclusion audio clobber ? Yes , but folks need to show up and watch it . I ’ve learned from experience on YouTube that you need to be consistent with topic coverage . So I would require to do it consistently and often enough to establish up an hearing . ( I ’d love to do it , but I think we ’d need to make some operational tweaks to make it do work . I ’ll see what I can do . )
Mini, micro, nano … what’s next?
Yeni write : I heard some people callQDEL“nanoLED . ” So does that mean this is the tangible nanoLED ? What should come after microLED television receiver — a superscript version of the already exceedingly superior microLEDs ? Are we progressing that tight ? I have n’t even got a microLED TV yet . I desire to hear your account since nobody on the net does it care you .
First , the yard of technology time lag for no - one . Just banter , you are n’t getting leave behind .
Here ’s the thing : There ’s a disconnect betweenmicroLEDand nanoLED . In the case of nanoLED , the “ nano ” is really reference a mensuration of size , whereas the “ micro ” in microLED is a loose reference to the size : about 50 to 100 micrometer caliper .
When regular light-emitting diode became smaller , the diligence used the word “ mini ” to indicate a reduction in size . However , when LEDs became even low , they were labelled as “ micro ” because micro sounds smaller than miniskirt . I ’m not sure it had much to do with micro — micron — as a measure .
With nano , quantum dotsare technically nanoparticles : particles that step at the nanoscale . Nano is 10 to the negative ninth power ( 10−9 ) and are much , much smaller than microLEDs . The difference between a microLED and a single quantum dot is like comparing the size of a association football ball to a leaf blade of pot on the auction pitch . One is fairly visible with the nude middle , but seeing the other need a microscope .
To get smaller than a nanoparticle , we would have to go to the pico scale of measurement , which is 10 to the negatively charged twelfth power ( 10−12 ) . I just have a operose time seeing how this is a benefit to a display .
I would worry less about how braggy the lighting is and compensate more attention to how it is used to your benefit .
Keep those questions coming . If you have a question you want answered , please transmit it to You Asked atDigital Trends pane comand we ’ll see if your query gets pick to be answered on the show .
