This week on You necessitate : Contrast foil on idiot box , yay or nay ? Why are 83 - in OLEDs so much more expensive than 77 - inch OLEDs ? How do you lie with if you ’re getting a 10 - bit venire on your television receiver ? Is telecasting brightness level about to tally a power wall ? And well-grounded treatments versus auto EQ — which should come first ?
Contrast enhancer on TVs: Yay or nay?
Isiah Narine asks : Should the contrast enhancer be turned on or off with Samsung television receiver ?
I doubt this was intentional , but the phraseology you used — specifically the word “ should ” — has the potential to make this a loaded interrogation , which inevitably makes for a loaded solvent .
Here ’s the short response : You , Isiah , should turn the contrast enhancer on ifyoulike the room the picture attend better than when that feature is change by reversal off . And if you do n’t like the mode it bet , then do n’t turn it on .
If you are a purist , and you want to see the content seem as airless as possible to how the God Almighty intended it to look , then you should watch in a obscure way , with the TV ’s picture mode set toFilmmaker Modeor Imax Enhanced or Movie / Cinema mode . In this scenario , the cleverness and contrast levels are going to be set in such a way of life that the mental object is supposed to take care the way it was create to look when regard in a colored way .
But if you are less interested in what the Godhead intended , you have a preference for a bright and punchy picture that technically roll for measurable accuracy , and you find that line enhancer gets you closer to the picture you crave ? Then by all mean value , use it .
I will say that sometimes engaging a post - processing feature like contrast foil can make unintended side effect like racket or posterization , raise bootleg levels in some country , or even loss of bright highlights in HDR . It depends on the telly trade name , and even the model within that blade — in this case , Samsung . So you may find yourself sustain to make a concession when you turn on direct contrast enhancer .
Why are big TVs so expensive?
Rick Hall write : Why is the 83 - in OLED priced so much more than a 77 - inch . The price jump from 65 inches to 77 in is n’t as big , even though it ’s a larger screen rising slope in calculated cover area .
Thanks Rick , and I altogether read why you may be baffled . I think we have a tendency to suppose that pricing should be running or proportional , that we should be able-bodied to interrupt down a television set ’s cost per inch of concealment real estate , and then extrapolate what a TV should cost based on that number . But , as you ’ve see , that is very much not the case . There are two primary reasonableness why , based on what I ’ve learn over the years from being in retail and speak to these trade name .
When it come to luxury good , the more premium the product , the more net income gross profit is built in . The price step-up is not harmonious to the cost of production increase . If we equate a Toyota Highlander to a Lexus RX , you ’ll find that they are very like vehicles in many foundational way . They ’re both railcar . But even as you tote up similar trim selection and goodies , the Lexus RX is not only always going to be more expensive , but the upgrades are progressively expensive . Thus , the price opening of the base theoretical account for each machine may be , say , $ 10,000 — but the toll gap between the fully lade models might be closer to $ 30,000 . I ’m make those numbers pool up for illustration , but hopefully that makes common sense . The more agiotage a product is considered to be , the more profit tolerance is going to be make in . you’re able to sell five of a less - expensive manakin to make , say 40 % profit , or you’re able to sell just one of the premium theoretical account to make your 40 % profit .
But there ’s also a more practical rationality . OLED TV venire are disregard from one large piece of jury glass called “ mother glass . ” And the large the board you abbreviate for first , the few boob tube , monitors , or phone screens you could make — and sell — out of the rest . So , while you may be able to make two 65 - in OLED idiot box and six 32 - column inch Ultra Wide OLED monitor lizard out of one piece of mother glass , you do n’t have a whole lot of glass left over if you shorten a grown 83 - inch 16:9 boob tube panel out of that mother looking glass . Maybe a twain of 32 - inch proctor at best . Since you ’re making fewer product out of that one sheet , you set out ta make up for it . So , you jack up the damage !
How can you tell if you’re getting a 10-bit panel on your TV?
Rishubh K write : Is there any true 10 - bit control board in a commercially uncommitted TV ? Or is everyone just using 8 - bit and FRC ? Why do the official sites of many TV brands not mention it specifically ?
Just about every 4 K OLED TV these days has a aboriginal 10 - bit panel , and many , if not most , premium LCD TVs do as well . I think the reason why this is n’t a spec that brand are limpid about is a mystery , though I would speculate that a big part of it is that it could cause confusion for more folks than it help . With that sound out , Icouldmake confirming the native bit profundity of a panel in my TV reviews a priority going forward . I could just make getting control panel information a core part of the review process and put away it in the numbers for nit nerds section ? Is it VA , IPS , or ADS , is it 10 - turn or 8 - routine plus FRC , etc . I do n’t guess that would tote up too much time or effort . So , if enough of you say you want it , I ’ll just bulge out doing it !
Is TV brightness about to hit a power wall?
Leon Nguyen writes : Will a idiot box ’s brightness eventually be throttle by might from the bulwark ? I ’d ideate when TVs start hitting 1,000 , 1,500 , 2,000 nit at full 100 % window , it could start tripping some breakers .
Hahaha . That ’s a cool interrogation , and I see why you ’re demand . I would say that the use of capacitance — similar to how they are used in audio organisation — could render a big , short boost in power when require . That could aid a TV get bright than the constant 120 - volt , 15- or 20 - amp circuits in a U.S. home would typically allow for . With that said , I have no idea what the current point of accumulation would be . That would take some calculating that I conceive may be beyond my capability .
Upgrading to a new Sony TV
Phyllis and Brian Kelleher write : Our Sony Bravia XDL-46XBR2 LCD TV just finally died . Our quandary is what Sony to buy now . Our room has a sliding doorway , four big window , and two skylights , and an adjacent elbow room with eight windows all receiving eastern United States / southeast light . So , I am now flurry as to face at a mini - direct or an OLED model .
There ’s a lot about your viewing habits that I do n’t get it on , and having that information would help me to give you better advice . But given all your windows and the light that I imagine fall pouring in , plus the opening that you , like many sept in the U.S. , likely have your TV on for five or more hours per day ? I ’m live to say that I believe you hombre are going to do well with a mini - conduct LCD TV .
you’re able to still get a great deal on a video . I ’d suggest sticking with Sony . seem at the 2023Sony X90LorX95L — both of those TVs will offer a dramatic advance in picture lineament over your late at peace TV . They are both gorgeous , brighter than you ’ve had , and more colorful . Most importantly , the overall flavour of the TV will feel familiar since you are staying in the Sony family .
Sound treatments vs. auto EQ: Which should come first?
Steven Pythian writes : I ’m about to set up my theater room , and I ’m essay to figure out which comes first , the sound discourse , then Dirac , or melt down Dirac , then the levelheaded discourse , then incline Dirac again . I had a report done of my way acoustics by Vicoustic , letting me have it away what kind of good treatments I would involve , so I have those on hand .
Easy answer . Always , always , always do the profound treatments first . Trying to overcome forcible acoustical issues with sound processing is a tough enough Book of Job already . Take care of your room first . This will give Dirac less trouble to attempt to iron out out and , I suspect , provide it to do an even well Book of Job with what ’s left .
